Clippers Suns trade.?

Question

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=336~614~1982~566&teams=12~12~21~21&te=&cash=

The Suns get a younger center and they get somebody who could play shooting guard for them instead of Bell.

The Clippers get Hill who can play either shooting guard or small forward for them and Shaq is just there to try to help Camby play defense.

Answer 1

Bell isn't on the team to score he is a solid defender with a strong offensive team like nash and stodimire and Marion untill the trade they need a defensive player at a position where alot of team stars are at the same position a defensive player can shut down the star. bad trade Mobley is old too and won't play well anymore.

Answer 2

what about camby?

Answer 3

nobody would want Shaq's stupid contract

Answer 4

When Chris Kaman wasn't injured last year he was the 3rd best center behind dwight and Drew.

They're not trading him for shaq.

Answer 5

That is a stupid trade. Kaman sucks balls. I would rather have a 50 year old Shaq than Chris Kaman. And Mobley hasn't been good for about 5 years. Dream on loser. The Clippers are still going to suck forever.

Answer 6

dumb trade.. shaq has a no trade clause anyways .. hill is broken all the time he misses games and suns would be dumb to do that...

Trade denied!

Answer 7

good, but w/ thorton and Eric gordon, Hill isnt needed, but i do like the idea of baron davis shaq, camby, thorton, and gordon on a team. plus suns get rid of shaqs huge salary.  so i like it