Commander in CHief?

Question

How can Clinton think she is best qualified to be our Commander in Chief? She has never been in the service, had very little to do with any military conflicts or actions, Would fight to the end before letting Chelsy join the service, Has never witnessed the real horrors of war, makes decisions without collecting the best available information. There are several other candidates who are far more qualified; at least two have been Commander-in-Chiefs (governors).

Answer 1

your telling me. along with that she wants to cut down the spending the military can spend so that it will decrease in size. what happens when another war breaks out and we don't have personnel to go over seas and protect interests we have.. if she become president the US will go down the shiter because she has no idea on how to run a country or how our military keeps us at the top of the food chain on the planet earth

Answer 2

I doubt that does believe that knowing that she has no military service but do we "have" to have a leader with military background? The President of the US has the head of every branch of the military advising them. Having said that I would say there are more qualified candidates, being first lady does not rank highly on my list of accomplishments for a potential presidential candidate. She was elected to the senate with a lot of help from Bill and is "Friends" so I don't give her alot of credit for that either. Taking these views into consideration she is not the most qualified. I do believe that there are other important factors to evaluate when choosing our next president like can he stop the bickering in Washington and bring a majority together and get some work done and does he or she have a vision of our future and the strength to see it through.

Answer 3

Commander in thief