Of course defining best is a little difficult but what I have in mind is what will reverse the problem in the least number of years with the least economic impact possible. Of course that could also mean spending money for investment now or for taking changes that might impact the economy a bit now but will keep enviromental damage including climate change, deforestation, loss of natural habitat, species decline and extinction, pollution, lack of resources, etc... from greatly impacting it later finding those changes that will ultimitly save the most money and make the most money and reverse the problems as quickly and fully as possible restoring the enviroment as well as possible. All peoples different ideas could be modeled into it as well as any combination of them as well as the impacts from specific actions on what is happening now. What do you think, would this help governments make the best possible legislation and steer the world towards the healthiest direction?
Tags: