Could it be possible?

Question

Do you think it maybe possible that Humans were "seeded" here on Earth at some point ?

Stop for a moment and seriously consider this idea.Is possible ( or probable) that Humans were "seeded" here on Earth at some point in Evolutionary History?

Could it be possible that our "ancestors" could have been technologically advanced "humans" who simply ventured out into the universe and ended up on Earth?

Leaving behind a few "Settlers" here on Earth.

Maybe "Adam and Eve" were simply placed here as a"innocents" for a purpose?

Is this theory really any more extreme than the idea that in the past humans migrated to other parts of the world?

As for those who want to argue that..."space travel" is impossible, let's go with the assumption that we still don't know this is absolutely true.

I'm not looking for Fear based arguement's...I'm hoping you may consider this as a "possibility"and try to

THINK outside of the safe box that you have been taught by religion and "Science"

The theories in Science are just that "Theories" and they are disproved everyday.

What was "TRUE" scientifically 300 years ago isn't today

As for the

The "No tools " or lack of archological evidence of "advanced technology" theory...doesn't apply.

The seeding would have been the same as dropping of a group of people on a isolated island or continent...except it is a Planet instead. No technology would have been "left behind" on purpose.

The Current Evolutinary evidence has many MISSING LINKS and then there is that Nagging little problem of NO evidence of a primate to Human LINK.

So if you really look at this possiblity objectively...is it really anymore ridiclous than the "other" theories?

In some way it actually supports the Adam and Eve story and the Evolution theorie at the same time...maybe both are correct.

Adam and Eve were seeded here and then "Evolved" (at the point of "Knowledge") into "Modern Humans"...

Please before you shoot your "pat answer off the hip"...objectively consider this possiblity.

Answer 1

not a cool Q it did not happen it wont happen so get that in ur head!  so as u can see my A is NO NO and NO!

Answer 2

Yes, it's perfectly possible.  There is no proof against it.  There's also no proof that the creatures who put us on this planet in your theory weren't blobs of ice cream in spaceships made of frozen bat urine.

But there is no proof for your theory at all.

Which is rather the point.  Possibility and truth are different things.

There IS a primate to human link.  If you take the skulls of primates and line them up in order of age, you can see the process of change taking place.  Yes, there are missing links - we don't have a skull from every single one of the thousands of generations of monkey before humans.  That is what is meant by a missing link when you are told there is a missing link by bible-bashing gun nuts who talk about Darwinists as "varmints".  h**l, we can see differences in skeletons from just 1,000 years ago - people were much shorter than we are today.  This is because natural selection has made taller people more attractive sexual partners, so they have taller children.  The taller you are, the more likely you are to pass on your tall genes to the next generation - and BOOM.  Evolution.

But where is the proof of the theory you describe?  That is objective consideration - there is no proof, therefore I cannot reasonably be expected to believe it.  If you say that this is not an objective conclusion, then it is YOU who has lost objectivity.

As for your argument that the theories in science are "disproved every day" - that is what science is.  Science is about disproving what came before and replacing it with something better, until that is disproved, which is why it is different from religion, which is about believing what came before regardless of proof to the contrary, and not allowing anyone to falsify your beliefs.  Eventually, the scientific process of forming and then disproving theories will lead us to theories which cannot be disproved - the truth.  Let's not forget that GRAVITY is only a "theory" - it's just been a theory for a very long time.  Until we can actually observe gravity, though, it must remain a theory.  This is what seperates a theory from a law - laws can be observed in effect (e.g. the laws of thermodynamics).  Theories have lots of evidence but have not been directly observed (e.g. the theory of black holes, the theory of star formation, the theory of evolution).

Your argument is not science because it is built on no evidence, and it is not falsifyable - I cannot reasonably argue against it, because any argument I put forth can be countered by you making up whatever you want to explain why the argument I put forth is so.  

For example, I put forth the argument that you have presented no proof at all, and that no proof of your theory has ever been found.  You could easily say "that's because no technology was left behind" - even though you weren't there and would have no way of knowing that.  You see, you are simply inventing details to support your theory in this way, therefore it is not scientific.

Until you can come up with a solid theory, with details which are corroborated by proof and evidence, then this is simply a hypothesis without proof.  When you have found evidence, it is a theory.  But the point is, none of us have any reason to believe this.

So, I would argue that, while possible, it isn't plausible in the least.  In fact, it may even be outside the realms of possibility - so incredibly unlikely that it's just a bad idea to believe it.

Answer 3

OK, this could possibly be another new hypothesis.

But anyway, if you talk of Adam and Eve to have been seeded, by some human explorers or so.., of whose existence am sure is quit hard to imagine since we have not yet sorted our own.

So, the question actually continues, because you will want to find out where and how these humans who seeded us here came into existence , although you say, they might have been technologically advanced Humans,meaning still human of Human race-both are the same or do you mean these advanced ones have more advanced brains, physic or ....

Honestly you argument holds water.

Thanks for sharing

Answer 4

Good imagination. Please support your view by something factual.

Answer 5

it is very possible, but my theory is that our ancestors were monkeys, and we just kept losing more and more hair and eventually changed certain features, i mean, one thing about it could be "why do we have a tailbone?". i dont know if this sounds really retarded, but i think both of our possibilities are correct.

btw, great question!

Answer 6

Absolutely possible.... though not likely because it is unecessary to explain our existence.

I have always loved the thought of ancient human Martians traveling here and setting up camp.  When you think about the sudden emergence of homo-sapiens on this planet, and the seeming immediate decline of neanderthals it is not so crazy.  Imagine a small group of astronauts make the relatively easy trip (we can do it now should we choose to) to a more primitive Earth afterwhich a calamity strikes the Martian planet.  They would have to stay.... and having only the technology from a single vessel they would be unable to replicate anything.  They would have to start from scratch.  Imagine being on a desert Island with 10 friends, and only your car..... you couldn't build a house, you couldnt build a gun, you could do almost nothing.  We know that ancient technology lasts far longer then modern technology so their would likely be no remnants of an ancient shuttle (were their one).

It is not unfathomable that these few explorers, being totally alone and understanding the necessity of genetic diversity for the health of a species would have begun mating with the more primitive humanoid species native to the planet.  It is known that modern humans have some neanderthal genes.... meaning sapiens and neanderthals did breed.  It would also go a long way in explaining why neanderthals (being entirely dominant) dissappeared in short order after the sudden "arrival" of homo sapien.  

Now I am not suggesting that if this were true the humans were more advanced then we are today..... if it was from Mars, then they would have only had to be at our current level of advancement.  Of course it looks like Mars has been dead for far longer then the arrival of homo sapiens on Earth..... but we are constantly finding new info about Mars, so maybe we will find that we are wrong about our timeline (wouldn't be the first time).

Personally I am always hoping that one of those martian rovers will dig up human bones.... with a little burial plague in a language similar to (but slightly different from) some ancient dead language.  Maybe find a library buried under the sand.... with a few good books still legible.  I know that is pie in the sky, but how friggan awesome would that be.  If only for the fact that it would completely wreck so many peoples minds.  Religions would be scrambling to find some interpretation of their bible to explain it, scientists would be aghast and start reformulating old biological theories, and the average joe would just be in a total state of confusion for at least a half hour (until he got hungry and forgot).

Answer 7

Thats a great perspective, but unfortunately, to believe that, you have to believe the bible, so it cannot be proven since technically, the bible is, in fact, mythology, no offense meant.

But i believe given all of the facts, that a supreme being, during the creation of the world, set everything in motion, i.e. evolution, big bang, etc.

If that is possible, then could this be possible? http://www.seeklyrics.com/lyrics/Psycrop...

Are those our ancestors?

Fact is needed, I am sorry to tell.

Answer 8

oww...my head hurts. i suppose it's another possibility, but I'M PRETTY SURE WE WILL NEVER, EVER, EVER FIND OUT. EVER.

Answer 9

no...actually...i cant say....but hats off to ur imagination!