Could someone please explain the difference between these two camera lenses?

Question

http://www.jessops.com/Store/s24080/0/Lenses/Nikon/50mm-f14-D-AF/details.aspx

Answer 1

As your earlier answerers have said, the faster the lens, the more you will pay. All of my lenses have a maximum aperture of f2.8, but then, I paid a tidy price for them.

I tend to go for the 'fastest' (maximum aperture) I can get, and am prepared to pay the price. As a basic guide, the f1.4 version will allow you to shoot in lower light levels at a comparatively faster shutter speed, but that is the price you pay.

If you are on a tight budget, then the f1.8 version will serve you well.

PS, you might be able to get a Sigma f1.4 at the same price you would pay for the Nikon f1.8.

PPS, none of my lenses are 'prime lenses', i.e  fixed focal length.  

Answer 2

The difference is one third a stop ... like the difference between 100 ISO and 125 ISO.  Not a lot.  But cost wise Whoosh!!!

Here is some detailed information on those two lenses (and others)

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/50-comp...

Answer 3

the second one has an aperture of 1.4 while the first has f1.8

that's the only thing different i think

the 2nd is a little better in low light which is good

jani

Answer 4

The difference is the minimum aperature and price. An aperature of 1.2  will allow you to take pictures with less light or faster moving objects than a lens with f 1.8. If you are an average user then you will get by with the cheaper lens. However if you are a professional that shoots in low light settings or need a lens that will give more speed then the more expensive lens is your better option.