Could that punk, floyd mayweather, beat suger ray leonard, or marvin hagler in primes?

Question

or tommy hearns? i say no! he is over rated!!

Answer 1

Sugar Ray and Marvelous, no, Hearns yes.  Emile Griffith would give him a run for his money as well!

Answer 2

i think it is hard to compare guys from different eras

Answer 3

not sugar ray, but the rest of them

Answer 4

NO WAY, man! You can count in Duran too.  Those guys will beat the **** outta Floyd Jr.

Answer 5

I am a Mayweather fan. I would have to say sugar ray robinson could beat him but no one else you said

Answer 6

Marving Hagler I doubt it.  I am a huge Mayweather fan and Hagler fan but at 160 Marvelous would have just been too tough and too strong and laid on the hurt by the end of 12.  I could see Floyd beating Sugar Ray as he has the skills and the physical tools needed to beat Ray.

Answer 7

Hagler had a solid 18 to 20lbs on him. He is possibly the greatest middleweight of the past 40 yrs or longer. Mayweather is much to small and may get seriously hurt. There are reasons for weight classes

Hearns had a huge height and reach advantage, and was incredibly powerful for a welterweight. Floyd would have to get inside and would be getting caught with the best right hand in the history of the division

Leonard was just as quick or quicker than Mayweather, he was much stronger and beat a much higher level of competition.

The only question with any of these fights is weather or not he could last without getting KO'd

Answer 8

are you 1 or something both of those fighters would knock mayweather stupid

Answer 9

I don't think he could have beaten Hagler at 160 he would have been too big for the smaller Mayweather. But he would have been more than a match with anyone at 147 throughout history. It's a toss up between Mayweather and Leonard but I think he would do a similar job to Hearns as Leonard did.