Could this be the best answer to sum up the Global Warming conspiracy?

Question

I just started this, looking for some team stats, and it somehow led me to reading a question the same person left about global warming... it took some effort but it has enlightened me on this debate, which I now feel really isn't one??

But anyway, I was skeptical, I first saw 'the global warming swindle' that a co-worker gave to me (who is a mormon btw, he says he doesn't know any mormons who buy into this "lie" about global warming), anyway, after seeing that movie, i understood what he meant... but then I watched al gore's movie on cable and wasn't so sure, so needles to say I was curious, and then I read this one comment, every link and then the clincher, I watched the youtube video link - last link, that he gave, it is the first part (part0, dont' ask me why), then had to watch the whole thing.

So again: Can this answer be topped to sum up global warming, can you do better?

netidol

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080422105731AAfHTv4&r=w#NbUvWze9WDeQd5uc34Vb

Answer 1

I don't think it's possible to compete with that answer.  Is it the best answer?  probably not, but it is probably the best one I've seen in awhile.

the links he gave are real good, I have to use some of those.

oh... jleblanc42... not sure what you were talking about, if you did bother to read that comment which this blog is referring to, he addressed the al gore facts/lies thing pretty good I think... just follow that link --- it was link no. {15}

Answer 2

Nah!  You can't top "deep in the rabbit hole".  It says it al

edit

Ah!  Three false statements spoken with one breath!  Do I hear four?

Answer 3

One could say this is what makes GW a subject of interest. Scienctist are even hestitant to base man made warming as the predominate factor for climate change. Theres always a citation for other factors used in their statements.

Answer 4

There is a reason most scientists are backing away from  the Global Warming Hoax.

Just look who is getting rich by it?  ( Aside from the millions AL Gorp has made on it).

Answer 5

Not really.

The whole AGW theory is hinged upon a correlation between detected temperature and detected CO2 levels in the atmosphere.  That's it.  If I tell you the same correlation can be made between detected temperature and detected sunspots, what does that tell you?  How does Earth's CO2 levels affect solar cycles??  

Everything else is smoke and mirrors.  Everyone will agree the Earth is warmer than it was during the last Ice Age, no point in proving a warming trend after the fact.  Let's focus on the CO2, and any other measurable correlations we find.

Answer 6

I don't know why you use the word 'conspiracy', since netidol was not talking about any conspiracy.

I think I summed up the science behind global warming quite well in the wiki article I wrote linked below.

Answer 7

Well, I like it.  :-)

There is far more than a simple correlation between CO2 and temperature.  Very simple physical models based solely on the physical properties of CO2 show that measured levels of CO2 would give just about the warming we're seeing.

The "sunspot" theory simply doesn't work.  The numbers come out wrong.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/arc...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7327...

Answer 8

If that's what you want to believe.  I think we have a very long way to go before we have a good understanding of the climate.  

As of today, no one can tell you if it will be warmer or cooler at any time in the future.

You are free to choose a side, but you cannot provide any facts other that you are following others.

Answer 9

Bear in mind that even Al Gore has admitted that he lied in his movie and some of the footage was faked.