Could you serve on OJ jury and be fair and impartial?

Question

I hope this is a fair question and I really like your honest answers.

Answer 1

Well, I wasn't really old enough to follow the first of the OJ trials, so I have no opinion one way of the other on what the virdict of that trial should have been.  To me, he's just an old guy who when a bit crazy.  So I would have to say that I could be impartial.  Also, in Michigan, the whole story is no big deal.  There hasn't realy been any coverage of this story in my area.  I would come into it with really no knowledge, just like any other case.

Answer 2

I think I would probably be overly sensitive to OJ, because of the breathless pundits clawing for ratings and the legion of armchair lawyers who do not accept a verdict that has nothing to do with this case.

Answer 3

Nope

Answer 4

I'd try, but I don't really think I could. He's guilty in my mind, regardless of what he does.

Answer 5

Yes,I could. I would be more fair and impartial than any of the  jurors on the last OJ trial. OJ himself says he prefers the jury

system.

Not that I wouldn't enjoy the chance to vote guilty and put him away...

Answer 6

Yes. And, since I live in Southern Nevada, there is a chance I could get called to serve on the jury if the case goes to trial.

Answer 7

I think OJ should have been put away for the murder of his wife. I think his jury is only going to be able to think about how his previous trial went wrong. He is in trouble. We didn't get him the first time with dna evidence though, so who is to say we will get him now? Our judicial system is a mess. If he did it he should pay for it!

Answer 8

Yes, and when they would call my name for Jury Duty, I would answer, "Guilty."