DOES ANY PRESIDENT HAVE ALL THE EXPERIENCE NEEDED TO BE ELECTED?

Question

It is not humanly possible for any presidential

nominee to have all the experience it will take to

run the White House, so why the flak on any one

candidate about experience? A person has to

use his or her skills in office to really have an effect on the affairs of Government matters, and

none shall escape. No one knows any more than

the other, but it's all about knowing what and how to decide when the occasion arises, to get things

done, experience is of no use if there's no skill

involved, errors can still be made with experience!

So what say you?

Answer 1

It's humanly possible if you're elected to a second term as President.  The first term, yes, you would be lacking in experience.  I, personally, vote on a politicians policies.  It really doesn't say much for our great country of the United States of America, that we've gone to the bottom of the barrel for our choices for President 2008.

Answer 2

Thomas Jefferson was had everything it took to be president: all his work during the French Revolution, forming our government and being a great Philosopher and humble. I'd vote for him.

Answer 3

No that's not possible.  But across America in business, local government and universities there are probably thousands of very competent Individuals who are more capable than 90% of the people we elect to high public office. Why do we continue to choose inept morons to represent us. John Adams would be outraged with the present crew of idiots in Washington given the responsibility of managing American business and security.