Define the 3 stages of feminism?

Question

1.imitation

2.the protest against the society of the gender equally

3.self discovery or trying to find out or identity being a woman

Answer 1

1/ Wanting the vote.

2/ Wanting it all.

3/ Hating it all.

Answer 2

Cover this mainstage first; I am a human being, cause that's your problem; you don't believe you are one. It's a feminists biggist complaint next to being oppressed. Listen I'm a woman and I don't buy that c**p.

Answer 3

1. Advocation of equal rights i.e. equity (fair treatment)

2. The realisation that equal rights and opportunities do not necessarily result in equal outcomes e.g. equal numbers of men and women in high powered positions

3. The dismissal of fair treatment and the start of a lobby for more considerations to ensure "equality" for the sake of being equal

Answer 4

1) support equal rights for both genders and sexes

2) ???

3) PROFIT

Answer 5

Actually no on all three... Try this rather academic, but much more realistic version by someone who knows.

From www.colorado.edu:

"My definition of feminism would be in three parts.

1). A "feminist" is someone who is interested in studying and understanding gender as a system of cultural signs or meanings assigned (by various social mechanisms) to sexually-dimorphic bodies, and who sees these cultural signs which constitute gender as having a direct effect on how we live our individual lives and how our social institutions operate.

2). Secondly, a "feminist" is someone who sees the gender systems currently in operation (in our culture and in other cultures) as structured by a basic binary opposition--masculine/feminine--in which one term, masculine, is always privileged over the other term, and that this privileging has had the direct effect of enabling men to occupy positions of social power more often than women. (Note: not all men eligible to occupy these positions of power; other binary oppositions are always also at work, such as old/young, or rich/poor, which will mitigate the effect of gender alone; hence a rich old woman might have more forms of social power that a poor young man. Obviously, too, this formulation depends on the kinds of social power one is discussing. Similarly, some women hold these positions, again dependent on other forms/positions of empowerment (race, class, education, age, physical ability, etc.). But the basic idea is, if you focus only on the male/female distinction, more men will wield social power (historically and cross-culturally) than women.

3). A "feminist" thinks this (points 1 & 2) is wrong, and should be changed."

There's more before this paragraph and after it.