Did Obama's Acceptence speech really have more details than McCain's?

Question

I heard and read them both and neither were real specific, in fact McCain's had a little more specifics than Obama's. So why is Obama and the Left saying McCain was UNSPECIFIC?

Obama

http://www.wbur.org/news/2008/79748_20080829.asp

McCain

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13179.html

Answer 1

I really didn't think Obama's had that much in the way of details, but I really don't think that many of the people listening to him were paying attention that closely.  They were too blinded by the light.

Now his star is being eclipsed by Palin and he's getting a little testy.  People might start listening more closely to his speeches and realize how little they actually amount to.

Answer 2

Both speeches are exception speeches they really shouldn't get into specifics until the debates.  That way you can hear them both at the same time - I cant wait for those.  

Answer 3

I actually liked both of their speeches.   I liked McCain's way better than Palin's and if it weren't for her I might have even considered throwing him my vote (depending on some other things).

I thought both Obama and McCain had solid speeches.