Did anybody stop to think that maybe Trig is still Bristol's baby?

Question

So she got pregnant AGAIN. It wouldn't be a big shock. She's obviously never heard of a condom. And, It's not like her mom could fake ANOTHER pregnancy for her when this baby is only a few months old.

Answer 1

A statement has been made that Mrs. Palin's daughter is expecting a baby and they plan for her to marry the father of the child. This statement seems to be due to the question of who's the mother of the child, Trig.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theworldnewser/...

Answer 2

That's ridiculous. Quit reading those liberal blogs.

It's not unusual for a woman to have a baby in her 40s. The older one gets, the higher the risk for complications like Down Syndrome.

Answer 3

I doubt it (and I am an Obama supporter).  Down's Syndrome is most common in babies of women over 40.  I believe Trig belongs to Sarah.

Answer 4

The baby is four months old. Her daughter is 5 months preggers. Do you understand the math?

Answer 5

You've got to be kidding me. Go search for pictures of Sarah being pregnant..conspiracy theory debunked.

Answer 6

the baby is four or five months pregnant she is five months pregnant..i dont know about anyone else but two natural births..no man was coming near the area within four weeks..it still hurt..any other ideas? also the downs syndrom how likely is it that a 17 year old had a baby that has it and knew it before it was born..are amnio's done on 17 year olds now..and if the father is a eskimo..the baby trig doesnt look it at all....in my opinion

you are right they do...but how many of them are on foodstamps trying to get some money? i would think her being 17 she is already in trouble with mom and dad and wouldnt have let a boy near the area so soon...some people listen to the drs and dont have s*x so soon after giving birth..so now she is a complete idiot and got pregnant with her second before she even had her first..perhaps we should put her on ripley's believe it or not..cause im not sure that is medically possible

Answer 7

NO ..simple math. She is 5 Months pregnant and Trig is 4 months old!!! Are you not that bright??????????

Answer 8

Hardly.

Trig was born in April.

That is around 4 1/2 months ago.

Bristol is five months pregnant.

Do the math.

Your insinuation is pathetic and irrational, but typical and completely expected.

Next!

Trig's birthday is April 18th. That makes him 4 1/2 months old.

Answer 9

Of all the disgusting liberal tactics I have ever had the displeasure of witnessing, this is by far the most disgusting. The picture used to 'prove' that Palin's daughter was pregnant with Palin's fifth child was taken in 2006 - to prove that she was pregnant in 2008. (That's when Trig was born, idiot.)

Answer 10

No.

(except for you of couse)

Keep up the good work, your level of respect is almost up to zero.

Answer 11

yes, and daddy is the proud new daddy.

Answer 12

if you want to know the truth..why not look it up for yourself & stop being a puppet. the proof is in the pictures when Sarah was pregnant.

Answer 13

No. Only ignorant people like yourself think that.

You got any proof she is pregnant again.

I didn't think so.

Answer 14

Yeah, I think it's possible.

Answer 15

are you so young that you cant add?

baby is 4 months old

that girl is 5 months pregnant!!!

lolol, you obama bots are so ignorant!!!!!!!!

Answer 16

so  whats  the  big  deal  im  sure  you  know  plenty  of  kids  who  dont  even  know  the  babies  daddy  and  they  get  welfare  and  food  stamps  you  dont  have  to  worry  about  this  one  they  will take  care  of  it

Answer 17

Of course! No one even saw her mom pregnant! The woman is a liar! And what about the son? Where is he?  If he was shipping off in a few months, wouldn't they want to spend time with him if they are so "close".  I think he is in rehab.

Edit: who says that the woman isn't lying about the baby that is already here and its age? She seems to be suspect about everything else.