Did man land on moon..???

Question

i still think of this alot of times, did man ever landed on moon, some say its impossible some say we did. Wats ur opinion?

Answer 1

yes much possible, because man has already touched so, it is possible to land on moon

Answer 2

I know men landed on the Moon. I was in high school at the time and, hard as it is to believe today, it was a BIG BIG deal. It got WAY more coverage in the media than anything that has happened ever since. More than the war in Iraq (both of them), more than the Olympics, more than the 9/11 terror attacks. More than anything in your lifetime if you are less than 40 years old. No way ALL that was faked. Sadly, by the time of Apollo 17 in 1972, people were getting bored with it, and complained about the cost, and it was canceled. Now days nobody even mentions it, except to say they don't believe it ever happened. So sad.

Answer 3

yes...

Answer 4

Are you really going to argue with the topic in being that this was probably the greatest achievements so far for all mankind? We landed on the moon, accept it. Don't waste your time embarrassing yourself all over the internet.

Answer 5

We DID.

If you don't believe it, you can always call NASA and argue with them.  

Answer 6

yes my dear brother

Answer 7

yup, they surely did...=D

n can u pls go to this link n ans. my question... i really need help..

http://sg.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind...

Answer 8

yes, of course

Answer 9

You have any doubt, then ask Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong  

Answer 10

that's a good question.

i've heard many times that it was "staged"

but who really knows for sure?

maybe we have the technology to

land on the moon...

but can't seem to find a cure for cancer, aids...etc.

eh, who knows.

Answer 11

Yes--

Here is one FACT to think about. Neil Armstrong left something on the moon which we still use today--    Read THIS as proof we were there---

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/...

Answer 12

ofcourse we did land over there

Answer 13

It was impossible until 4:17pm EDT on July 20,1969 when two men actually did it.  Opinon doesn't matter.  You have every right to disbeileve the facts. But the truth is it did happen.  Nothing anyone says can change that.

Answer 14

"SANSHAYATMA VINNSHYATI". [One who does not believe in the facts, definitely decays] Eti: Bhagvat Geeta.

Answer 15

This is not my "opinion" it is a fact. We landed on the moon 6 successful times- Apollo-11, Apollo-12, Apollo-14, Apollo-15, Apollo-16, and Apollo-17.

We left laser reflectors on the moon that astronomers use today... no way we would've done that with rovers in the 70's.

Common conspiracy theories:

"Why was the flag waving?" It wasn't waving, just crumpled. It was held up by a horizontal bar.

"Why were there multiple shadows?" The moons surface shot light onto the highly reflective lunar module and astronaut space suits, shooting light in multiple directions.

"Why were there few stars visible?" Take a picture of the night sky with your digital camera at night and see how many stars show up in your photo. Now imagine light is being shot into your lens, and this is in the 70's.

"How could they have survived the radiation?" Lethal dose is 350-400 rems and they must be exposed for about 2 hours. Apollo astronauts were only subjected to 2 rems over a period of 30 minutes.

EDIT: Look "Babee", you can't compare space exploration with the medical world. They have nothing in common.

Answer 16

Twelve men have walked the surface of the moon.  Some have practiced their "tee shots".

Answer 17

I went home from work early and watched it all on the black and white television I will always say yes they sure did it there was no way they at that time had the expertise or equipment to do an animation that would not have been flawed in some way to do a mock up ~~

Answer 18

I don't see how we didn't or couldn't land on the moon, even in 1969.  What would be the reason to make it up?  To show up the russians?  Even now, with today's technology, it would be a much easier thing to accomplish, but there needs to be a reason to do so.

Once the ISS is finished and the constellation fleet is built, they have plans to go back to the moon.

Answer 19

Which is more probable?

We went to the moon with less computer power than a modern digital watch, and we're going again. Then to Mars and off to Zeta Reticuli.

or

Your government has sold you out and wants to force this on you:

http://www.verichipcorp.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0gXGTcd6...

Check this out:

Lawn furniture or super groovy interplanetary spaceship of the naive 60's?

http://moonmovie.com/images/AS11-40-5922...

(make sure to enlarge in order to really get a good look at American engineering at its finest)

Answer 20

Opinion doesn't matter.

What matters is facts.

Fact: 2 men landed on the moon on July 20, 1969.

Fact: another 10 men landed on the moon after that (between November 1969 and December 1972).

Fact: thousands of technicians and scientists were involved in the US space program for years before the first moon landing.

Fact: the people that doubt it happened weren't around at the time, they didn't see the most important achievment of mankind (and likely feel that they missed a significant historical event.

Fact: people that doubt it happened should learn to live with the facts.

Answer 21

I think..

NO..



if NASA has the technologies to walked on moon in late 70 (1969), than why NASA is taking more time to revisit moon. I think, there are some secrets and NASA dnt want to open that.

Answer 22

Good question...I also think about d same many times!!

I always hesitate to say yes.......

Answer 23

YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

YES YES YES YES

I've only answered this question a dozen times.  Ain't today's skools wnnerful?  I wundr how goodest dey teach gooder thiings leik consyracy theeries.  And we wonder why industry sends work overseas.  



We did land on the moon, the landings were not faked, the flag wiggling was caused by the astronaut's hand, there is a solar wind in space, the sun is bright that why you don't see stars, shadows are not always opposite the light source, the Van Allen belts are low energy radiation, the moon has a highly reflective surface, you can't hide a 35 story tall rocket in space, there was no black duct tape pasted to the window, the moon's surface has a shallow layer of dust, hydrazine doesn't burn with an intense blue flame like you see in cheap sci-fi flicks, the thrust from the LM was diffuse that why it didn't raise big clouds of dust, it didn't need to be that powerful because of the moon's 1/4-of-Earth's-gravity.  ( takes breath. )  

Got it?  Oh, and it's not that hard to take pictures without looking through a view finder.  

Answer 24

Yes, the Moon landings were real.  The evidence is one-sided in favor of Apollo's authenticity.

The people who say it was impossible generally just don't know themselves how it was done.  They misunderstand what is required to do it, or underestimate the capacity of the people and machines that did it.

Answer 25

No

but their spacecraft did, and the guys just went outside.