Did the ending ruin an AWESOME HIAC??

Question

Best match all year. Why they never let Edge win a legit match is beyond me. Undertaker throwing Edge through the ring after the pin, well, been there done that over and over and over. Did that lameness ruin what was by far the match of the year so far?? You obviously know my answer. No I don't hate the Undertaker. Just once though, I'd like them to make his charachter more intriguing by having him beat at his own game such as HIAC or God forbid at WM.

It would have been a much bigger suprise if Edge did that, or something else devastating to Undertaker. Instead, once again WWE takes the safe approach with Taker, ever preserving the legacy of the almighty Deadman.

A PPV as big as Summerslam should have at least one "wow, didn't see that coming!" A John Cena out of nowhere at the Royal Rumble sort of thing. I feel cheated after a PPV again.

Answer 1

No it made it even MORE AWESOME!!!

Answer 2

no it made it better..they do let edge win legitmate matches..have u seen one night stand 2008

Answer 3

i agree wit u   i taught i was the only one who taught it was better if edge win  they always s***w the heels/good wrestlers by having them loosing so the little kids can stay happy its bs  edge shouldve won

Answer 4

no no no. why do people whine everytime edge losses something big. no wrestler can have it all. edge banishing taker at ons was a far greater accomplishment then him winning h**l in a cell. edge got tlc taker got h**l in a cell. taker is not past his prime hes not even in one. he never cared about titles just putting people over including edge. ons helped edge ot. backstage taker has done a whole h**l of a lot for edge. since edge first came to the wwe. wrestling as a whole s getting lame now bwcause all people care about is their favorite wrestlers winning all the time and people being overated and complaing about legeneds. the ending made sense. edge is a very talented person and has many great things in store for him so stop whiingig edge heads.

Answer 5

nno it's hard to break the ring. the ring is very hard. so the ending was good

Answer 6

i feel the same way

like i said it was all too predictable. we all guessed the correct match endings with the finnishes weeks before it actually aired

Taker shouldve lost. not because im a Edgehead but because an ending like that was real g*y especially after they were building Edge back up

why build a wretsler up just so they can be dropped by somene way past his prime.

all endings ruined what couldve been a good ppv

Especially match one. we couldve seen a terrific match between two great athletes. but instead we get a aneding that makes MVP look weak

All the heels look even weaker after summerslam

wich is pathetic because most of the heels are the better athletes

Answer 7

Dude, it didn't ruin it.

It perfected it.

Answer 8

Wow, you really think that? With that reaction, you must have not been watching wrestling very long, or have you forgotten?

First of all, the ending was spectacular! The way Undertaker "sent Edge to h**l" was unbelievable. Probably will rank as one of the best HIAC in WWE history.

As for your statement, you really would like to see Undertaker lose at his own game? I should let you borrow my No Mercy 2002 DVD and let you watch Brock Lesnar beat Deadman for the WWE Championship.

There, problem solved.

Answer 9

dude no way it was awesome man it was a good way to end it since edge is all like im taking you down to h**l with me it was a good ending and deadman guy the ring is hard but its not that hard its like a big trampoline

Answer 10

The ending of that match with the chokeslam through the ring and the fire marked history, sorry to break it to you...  

Answer 11

The ending was cheesy but the wwe will never let undertaker lose at his own game because its all about money and politics

Answer 12

no.

Answer 13

nope.