Did you know Shiasm actually encourages its followers to do Mutah?

Question

On page 356 in volume 1 of 'Tafseer Minhajul Sadiqeen' it is mentioned that Muhammad (may Peace Be Upon Him) said: "One who performs Mu'ta (temporary marriage) one will attain the rank of Imam Husain; one who performs it twice will attain the rank of Imam Hasan; one who performs it thrice will attain the rank of Ameeral Mo'mineen (Ali r.a) and one who performs it four times will attain my rank."

Answer 1

Just wait as my shia brothers are on their way to come up with their justifications. Muta'a is nothing but a form of prostitution, given a legal title of Muta'a marriage which was generated by a human being, not by Allah or his Rasool Saw. ~!

Answer 2

Yes I did not know this just another reason to show people how astgfurAllah wrong the shias are.

Answer 3

I never even heard of Mutah until Yahoo answers, and is still didnt beleive it. I had to ask my mom if it was true. I dunno know but something is definetly wrong with this whole mutaa and it sounds very familiar....whats the word i am looking for.......?

Answer 4

lol, i didn't even know this Mutah, i learned about it on this Yahoo!Answer!!!

they should read this!!!

Ali ibn Abi Talib رضی الله عنه reports that the Prophet Muhammad صلی الله عليه وسلم on the occasion of the battle of Khyber prohibited Muta with women and from (eating) the meat of domestic donkeys.

Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim!!

Answer 5

Reply One - A hadith that has not been verified by a hadith scholar cannot be relied upon

We read in Ahl as-Sunnah esteemed masterpiece Taufa Ithna Ashari, Chapter 9 page 266 Muthaeen Abu Bakr:

In the eyes of Ahl as-Sunnah, only those hadith are reliable that appear in the authoritative texts of hadith scholars.

Using this argument, we would point out that both hadith have not been recorded / relied upon by any authoritative hadith scholar.

Reply Three - The narrators of the Khayber tradition are weak

A narrator in the chain is Husayn bin Alwan, about whom we read in Rijjal al Kashi and Rijjal al Kabeer:

"He was a 'Aam' Kufi"

When our hadith scholars grade a person as 'Aam' this means that he was 'common' a Sunni.

Another narrator Amro bin Khalid was also a Sunni (Wasail al-Shia, v30 p438) and if we analyze his status from even Sunni sources, we would come to know that he was not an authentic narrator as Ibn Hajar said about him: 'Matruk'. Yahya ibn Mueen said: 'liar' and Abu Zar'a said: 'He used to fabricate hadith'.

Having Sunni narrators in Shia text is not a strange thing. If we analyze the Shia text, we would come to know that some Shia narrators used to take traditions from Sunni narrators mixing up the chain of narration, as we read in Rijal Kashi, Volume 2 page 855:

Ibn Shaza said: 'My father [ra] asked Muhammad bin Abi Umair: 'You met many A'ama (Sunni) scholars, how come you didn't hear (hadith) from them?' He replied: 'I heard (hadith) from them, but I saw many of our (Shia) companions heard from the A'ama (Sunni) narrations and Khasa (Shia) narrations, then they mixed up until they attributed the narrations of A'ama (Sunnis) with the Khasa (Shia) and the narrations of Khasa (Shia) with the A'ama (Sunnis), therefore I disliked to mix up the traditions, so I left that and remained on that (narrating only from Shia).'

Keeping this thing in mind, we know that the prohibation of Mutah at Khayber narrated by Ali [as] is found in Sunni text, thus it is quite possible that the shia narrators heard it from the Sunni narrators, mixed up the chain and attributed the tradition to Zaid bin Ali.

We shall also point out that a tradition is referred to as 'Sahih' according to the Shia school when:

ما اتصل سنده بالعدل الإمامي الضابط عن مثله حتى يصل إلى المعصوم من غير شذوذ ولا علة

"What is narrated in succession by the authentic and preserved Imami narrator from the same quality narrator till it ends to the infallible without any oddity or malady"

Resael fi Derayat Hadith by Abu al-Fazl al-Babeli, Volume 1 page 395

The very principle can also be found in Sunni school as Allamah Ibn al-Salah said in his book 'Muqadimat ibn al-Salah' page 16:

"The Sahih hadith is the one with continued chain continually narrated by the just and preserved narrator from the just and preserved narrator till it ends without being odd or malady'.

The oddity of any tradition can be defined as:

"The oddity is the sole chain hadith contradicting the various chains of hadith"

Resael fi Derayat Hadith by Abu al-Fazl al-Babeli, Volume 1 page 409

And this rule is not exclusive to the Shia school, rather Sunni school also uphold the very principle as Allamah Ibn al-Salah said in his book 'Muqadimat ibn al-Salah' page 61:

"Verily the odd (hadith) is what the authentic (narrator) narrated contradicting what the people narrate, al-Hafiz Abu Y'ala al-Khalili al-Qazwini reported the same definition from al-Shafiyee and group of scholars of Hijaz and then he said: 'What is adopted by the scholars is that the odd hadith is which has only one chain narrated by an authentic or even unauthentic Sheikh, so what was narrated from unauthentic Sheikh is abandoned and what is narrated by authentic Sheikh so they stop on it and don't use it as proof'."

So the cited tradition is weak by both the perspectives mentioned by Allamah Abu Fal al-Babeli i.e. it is neither narrated by authentic and preserved Imami narrator from the same quality narrator till it ends to the infallible Imam nor it is free from any kind of oddity and malady since it is narrated by only one chain of narration contradicting the Shia hadiths which are more than two hundred in number pertaining to the permissibility of Mutah. Abu al-Fazl al-Babeli stated in his book 'Resael fi Derayat Hadith' Volume 1 page 488:

"If a contradiction took place then the priority will be given to the abundance (of hadith)."

The tradition therefore is of no value to us, since it:

   1. Contradicts the Qur'an

   2. Contradicts the words of Maula 'Ali(as)

   3. Contradicts the views of all of our Imams.

Moreover Ayatullah (late) Syed Abul Qasim al-Khoei mentioned the same after citing a few traditions on the prohibition of Mutah (including the one narrated from Ali [as] for the prohibition of Mutah at Khayber) in his authority work 'Al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Quran' page 313:

"Answer:

First: Abrogation cannot consist of a 'ahad' tradition, as we mentioned several times.

Second: These narrations contradict the muttawatir narrations of Ahlulbayt (as) which refer to the validity of mutah and the Prophet never forbidding it."

http://www.shiaweb.org/quran/bayan/pa63a...

On page 322 of the same book, he clearly stated:

"What has been narrated from Ali [as] regarding the prohibation of Mutah is absolutely fabricated."

And most importantly, the cited traditions narrated by Ali [as] suggest that Mutah was prohibited at Khayber whereas we already have advanced authentic traditions that point to the practice of Mutah after the victory of Makka, a year after Khayber.

COPIED AND PASTED JUST LIKE YOU DID!

Now you can look at some Sunni rulings the same way you attacked Shias without thinking someone can attack Sunnis the same way. This is NOT a personal ATTACK on Sunnis, it is just to show that Shias can make equivalent charges on them. Remember I am neither Shia or Sunni I only stand for justice:

Shamsuddin Ibn Qayyim al Jawziya who is one of the only scholars that the Wahabis do not reject and who was a student of Ibn Taymiyya. Let us quote what he writes in his Bada'i al-Fuwa'id, page 129:

"Ibn 'Aqeel, and many of our scholars, and our Shaykh [Ibn Taymiyya] have ruled that masturbation is makruh (disliked), and never explicitly said he that it was haram".

Bada'i al-Fuwa'id of Ibn Qayyim, page 129

He then presents his own discussion on the conditions that make masturbation halaal:

"If a man is torn between continued desire or releasing it, and if this man does not have a wife or he has a slave-girl but he does not marry, then if a man is overwhelmed by desire, and he fears that he will suffer because of this (someone like a prisoner, or a traveller, or a pauper), then it is permissible for him to m********e, and Ahmad (ibn Hanbal) is explicit on this. Furthermore, it is narrated that the Companions of the Prophet (s) used to m********e while they were on military expeditions or travelling".

Second example of Sunni morality Sunni 'Ulama Legitimised the Use of a Dildoe (female s*x toys)

After this ingenious fatwa, Ibn Qayyim then goes on to make permissible the use of a dildoe by women. It is only logical; when the husbands leave to go m********e and spread Islam by the sword, they need something to do with themselves. On the same page as quoted above, Ibn Qayyim writes:

"If a woman does not have a husband, and her lust becomes strong, then some of our scholars say: It is permissible for the woman to take an akranbij, which is a piece of leather worked until it becomes shaped like a p***s, and insert it in herself. She may also use a cucumber".

Another example of Sunni (this time Salafi) morality - A Salafi woman can suckle a Salafi man with a beard

We read in Sahih Muslim Hadith Number 3426:

Ibn Abu Mulaika reported that al-Qasim b. Muhammad b. Abu Bakr had narrated to him that 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail b. 'Amr came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Messenger of Allah, Salim (the freed slave of Abu Hudhaifa) is living with us in our house, and he has attained (puberty) as men attain it and has acquired knowledge (of the s*x problems) as men acquire, whereupon he said: Suckle him so that he may become unlawful (in regard to marriage) for you He (Ibn Abu Mulaika) said: I refrained from (narrating this hadith) for a year or so on account of fear. I then met al-Qasim and said to him: You narrated to me a hadith which I did not narrate (to anyone) afterwards. He said: What is that? I informed him, whereupon he said: Narrate it on my authority that 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) had narrated that to me.

Answer 6

It also encourages full nikah... the idea is that if you're in dire need don't fornicate, marry full nikah and if you can't do that then marry mutah.

Answer 7

Wow, so a temporary marriage in which 2 shia's just have s*x can catapult them to a higher rank than the ahlul bayt? wow.

Wow.

wow.

Edit- How wierd......and quite disappointing....I wish they would stop this obsession with the prophets family, and follow the quran and sunnah. The ummah would be so much more unified. May Allah guide them to the right path.....Islam