Didn't Algore declare the end of debate?

Question

(I guess that's the perrogative of a Nobel Peacenik Prize winner.)

http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2008/20080303175301.aspx

How can there be any disagreement, except from Exxon/Mobile and evil "right-wingers"?

Answer 1

yes the guy that started the weather channel is now an expert on climatic modeling.

why have there been no papers submitted to journals that have passed peer review rebuking AGW then?

Answer 2

global warming does not exist.

Answer 3

I wonder if Aristotle and Eratosthenes published spherical Earth articles in peer-reviewed journals and what the response would have been from the flat Earth consensus of the times?

I love the preoccupation with the holy, almighty peer-reviewed journal.  The review is only as good as the peers and if the peers have a made their decision prior to reviewing the article, what good is the peer review?

Answer 4

So you're saying that CO2 levels and rising temperatures are just coincidental? Lol

Answer 5

Kind of like demanding a recount only of certain largely Democrat-leaning counties rather than a statewide recount.

Answer 6

Yes, Al Gore did declare the end of debate. Of course he did this right after he made up a bunch of lies to try and end the debate. Oh wait, he has been afraid to debate. So I guess he never ended it, since he has been afraid to start it.

Answer 7

I think he meant the end of debate among the scientific community, not among television channels.

BTW exxonmobile has left your camp

Answer 8

So, John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, thinks anthropogenic global warming is a fraud. Yay him. Now, if you'd be so kind as to point me to his research on climate science that he's had published in the peer reviewed literature, I'd be much obliged.

What's that, you say? John Coleman has never published a single article in the scientific literature? Hmm, so why exactly am I supposed to care what he thinks about the matter?