Difference between ksix one tour and ksix 95?

Question

Hi, I'm looking for a new racket to buy.

I have tried out the ksix one tour and liked it very much, only con is that the headsize might be a bit to small and i might be framing it to much. I was thinking that the ksix one 95, having similar specs and 5 more sq inches of headroom, might be a bit easier for me to use than the apparently demanding 90 inch size.

anyone tried either or both and are they hard to use?

Answer 1

in my opinion, the 5 square inches dont help out too much. i use the tour and i find it very comfortable. it took awhile to get used to since i used a wilson hyper hammer but once i got used to it, i rarely ever hit frame. i've tried both and found they are both relatively easy to use once you get used to it (the 90 inch isnt too demanding). i've been playing for about 3 years now so im not pro but i am #2 on my team so i guess it also depends on how long you've been playing. if you end up buying the tour, keep practicing with it until youre completely comfortable with it and youll be fine.

Answer 2

If you like the Tour I would say stick with it.  I am a teaching pro and I was looking to switch back from Babolat to Wilson last year, so I tried out the new K's at the time.  The 95, while having the bigger head size, feels pretty dead because of the intense string pattern (18X20).  So I chose the Tour and am happy with it.  Just recently I switched again to the K-Blade Tour, however, and while it takes a bit of getting used to, it feels great after about a week.  So I would try that one out, but the Tour would also be a great pick.  Good luck!

Answer 3

different head sizes

Answer 4

both racquet's are good. they are almost the same too. just the color and shininess. 5 inches does make a difference. it gives u a slightly bigger sweet spot. i was about to get the 1 as well then i saw the k90 instead. but the string bed is tighter on the 95 thats the only thing i didn't  like about it.