Do Big Bang consist of a separation of 2 things.?

Question

=> To Polonius:

So, before the explosion, matter were blended with the space, then they were separated?

Answer 1

no. the big bang happened lyk this. first our universe was a tiny particle smaller than an atom. due to chemcal reactions it grew to the size of a football. after 3 million years it was so hot that it exploded

Answer 2

Matter and antimatter were suddenly created in almost equal amounts.  Then they annihilated each other back into energy.  What remained was the roughly 1/10,000 slight excess of matter over antimatter.  Someone else mentioned the forces and there is a lot being written about string theory in which a dozen or so dimensions may have been created.

Answer 3

no.

The Big Bang theory explains what happens if you begin with a very hot and dense universe, which expands and cools.

It is based on a hypothesis;  the original version was called the Primordial Atom Hypothesis, in which the word atom meant "the whole thing", not the modern sense of the word atom, as in chemistry.

There was (and still is) one universe.  As we apply knowledge from various branches of science (e.g., physics, chemistry) to how the universe must have been in the past -- in order to explain what we see today -- we find that the universe was hotter and hotter as we get closer to time = zero.

However, we can't get beck to exactly zero.  We can go back as far as the Planck Time (very, very close to zero, but NOT zero).  At that moment, the universe was so hot (the energy density was so high) that every single point would have been a black hole.

Some scientists have explored the idea that the universe we know could be one half (or even one quarter) of whatever "appeared" at the exact moment of time = zero.

One interesting idea (almost fifty years ago) was that another universe, equal in energy to our own, separated from ours and immediately began expanding towards the past just as we began expanding into the future.  Others involved a universe and an anti-universe, expanding along different time axes.

All these ideas were dropped because they were impossible to verify and they added a lot more complications than they actually solved.

So, maybe the universe did begin as the separation of two (or more things), but that would be very unlikely -- not impossible, just unlikely.  

However, the Big Bang theory only bothers with explaining one universe.  It does not include any separation of 2 things in order to explain the existence of the universe.

Of course, after the expansion begins, things do separate from the "Ylem" (a name given to "whatever" the energy was made of, before it separated into the forces and the particles).

Answer 4

yes, the big bang occured because the negative and positive (male and female) separated from each other. and now that they have separated, love tries to put them back together with gravity and magnetism and human love

Answer 5

No, the Universe began as a spontaneous creation, borrowing energy from the void. Time and space also began at the same time, as part of the energy was turned into matter (via E=mc^2). It was not an 'atom', nor did it contain atoms. Atoms formed much later. Nor was it the size of a football for 3 million years. Due to a phenomena called 'inflation', the Universe grew much faster than expected (faster than light). As it expanded, it began to cool. Eventually it was cool enough for the building blocks of atoms to form, and finally, atoms were created. At one point when the expansion cooled enough to allow photons to travel through space, it formed a burst of light that we can see today, redshifted and cooled to just above absolute zero. It's called the Cosmic microwave background, and was discovered in 1964.

Answer 6

It wasnt Big, nor was it a Bang.

The Big Yawn theory is where everything just 'exploded' sort of, and expanded from the center slowly.

The Big Crunch theory is where it expanded and contracted to make a so called 'crunch' effect, and expanded again.

Answer 7

jack is wrong. the big bang consists of a separation of many things.

the four forces separated. and i guess you could say matter and energy separated.

Answer 8

The Big Bank was an explosion of

1.Space

2. Time

All matter was concentrated into a space smaller than the head of a pin!

Matter was in a different state then.

See also inflation theory!

Answer 9

Not uh. The main theory is that it began with a simple atom [as.. we really don't know how that atom got there..]

as everything in the atom [electrons, protons, neutrons, etc.]

.. something in the atom rather than everything, eventually hit another something inside this atom.. therefore sparking and creating matter [more space, more atoms] creating a mass chain reaction causing the Big Bang.

Answer 10

Well no one knows for sure because we don't have technology to test theory yet.  But, imagine everything around you being clumped together.  There are some atomic substances that don't play well together.  I would guess that when you get enough force squeezing a substance together than the explosion would send fragments throughout the galaxy.  It was probably the separation of many things look at the universe and think about the fact that the shrapnel from the explosion is still expanding!