Do You Believe Governments Should Start Repealing Global Warming Response Acts?

Question

“There are many credible members of the scientific community who have questioned the theory of global warming, and now we have some scientists actually suggesting the earth’s temperatures may be entering a period of dramatic cooling,” said Doherty. “With this growing level of scientific uncertainty, it makes no sense to enact a new set of economically damaging regulations prompted by the global warming hysteria of recent years.”

Do you agree?

http://www.politickernj.com/bguhl/22291/doherty-new-scientific-data-justifies-repealing-global-warming-response-act

Answer 1

I completely agree.  It is not too late to admit they were wrong and correct for their mistakes.  Until the global warming community can clean up their hockey sticks, consider data and studies that are contrary to their religion, and stop making up data like GISS and James Hansen, there should be no laws passed regarding CO2.  

I am all for efficiency, and becoming independent from the oil of other countries, but it is a fraud enacting CO2 legislation based on misinformation propagated by a political body like the IPCC.    

Answer 2

We can't afford to take the risk that global warming isn't happening.

I personally have seen all the scientific evidence and at this point I have no doubt that carbon dioxide is heating the atmosphere, acidifying the oceans, drying out the earth, melting the ice caps, and threatening ecosystems everywhere. However, I know that many aren't accepting the proof that's already available and are still waiting for more.

No matter your degree of scientific knowledge, I hope you see that we must work to protect the environment for the future of the planet and its inhabitants. We can't wait until it's too late, because future generations will pay the price, and it's not fair to them or the other species that share our planet.

Answer 3

Absolutely.  Kyoto has to be the first agreement to be junked, and then the others will fall on their own.

Answer 4

Yep.  They should stop - but they won't, unless Obama wins and a democrat was the one who figured it out.

Answer 5

Yes, Global warming was at best a con job to get money.

Answer 6

Robert Heinlein proposed an interesting concept in his novel, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.

A character in the book suggested a bicameral legislature, one house devoted to passing laws and the other devoted to repealing them.

To get a law passed requires a 2/3 majority and to get one repealed at least 1/3 minority.  Figuring that if at least 2/3 of people don't think its a good idea or at least 1/3 think its a bad idea it shouldn't be a law.

With that in mind we could repeal a bucket load of bizarre laws including this global warming idiocy.

Answer 7

They must have a very strange definition of credible.

Answer 8

absolutely.