Do You Think The Wwe Should Use Buried Alive Matches And Ambulance Matches etc.... More?

Question

Just to see if you believe the wwe should use these matches more and more rather than just the normal: hardcore,street fight, h**l in a cell etc?

Answer 1

** **** ****** **** *** **** *** ******* **** *** **?

B R E A K T H E C O DE F O R A H U G E W W E S P O I L ER O N A F O R M ER W W E S U P E R S T A R R E T U R N I N G

Answer 2

No. The major gimmicky matches need to be used as little as possible, so when they are done it's a big deal and more interesting.

Answer 3

yes there more fun to watch  

Answer 4

If they do it, they've gotta do it to push the new guys. I mean, I can honestly say, I think Undertaker/HiaC matches, RKO/Last Man Standing & Edge/TLC matches are great. But, they need to build up the new talent first. I love seeing these types of matches. But they need to do it in a way that it is bringing something new to the table. To see the old talent shuffled about in the old concept matches will not bring new viewers in to the fold. There has never been a Triple H vs Undertaker Buried Alive match. But, despite personal differences, why should there be? It's the same players, and the same games. Let's have some new concept matches with the ECW guys. That's what I want to see.... How about making Wrestlemania 25 Money-in-the-Bank as an ECW exclusive??? I think they need to alter the old concepts before they bring back the old viewers.