0 LIKES LikeUnLike
Or should we respect the people behind every idea but not necessarily the ideas themselves in a political debate?. I definitely lean more towards the second but am very interested to hear what others think. Bare in mind that almost anything can be considered ideas by some. That the earth is flat or that cats bark could be considered ideas by some at some point in time (took hypothetical very unlikely examples to keep the Q neutral but I hope it's still clear what I mean)Do you have to respect ideas if you consider them nonsense in a political debate or is it your duty to the best of your ability and knowledge explain and defend the reasons why these ideas are not serious to you?
Tags:
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Latest activity: earlier. This question has 15 answers.