The ball was used yesterday at Lord's for a "test" ODI match and everyone agreed it was easier to see and the colour held up for the 50 overs.
So if it's easier to see, this will in theory benefit the bowling side in the outfield and the batsmen on the pitch.
In the last 10 years there have been 1290 caught/run out dismissals, compared with 1433 stumped/bowled/LBW.
With a little extrapolation, the pink ball will therefore benefit the batsmen more, and we could see even higher scores. This, and we will be able to see the bal better too - whether on TV or at the ground.
Even the the colour as been criticised as a little "festive" for cricket, could it increase viewer interest?
Tags: