Do you agree or disagree?

Question

reason out, is there really a need for children who have trouble in education(hardheaded, childish, cannot read and understand), to go to education

yes or no?why?

Answer 1

Maybe these kids act the way they do because of issues at home, so it wouldn't really be their fault and every child deserves a fair chance at having a happy life

Answer 2

Honestly, probably not. Those who want to rise intellectually, will do so. Those that don't will find their own means of living. Each is fine and to each their own. There are plenty of meaningful jobs that emphasize physical, rather than mental, attributes that such folks can undertake.

I propose that a basic education, say, at least through 8th grade (in US academic terms) should be provided for everyone, and those that wish to continue in school should be provided all further schooling at no cost, including college.

Answer 3

yes, because they also need help, not just you you

Answer 4

they should go to educational institutions specialized to children with those troubles where they interact with children like them,but not staying at home

Answer 5

Children having trouble in school should be given every chance to learn and prepare for a productive life. The idea of education is for people to learn to be part of society - to develop whatever aptitudes one has in order to function well. We do not live in a world where the so-called hardheaded, childish, illiterate, or those of limited capacity to understand are hidden away. All these people are part of the world and learning can become fuller for the so-called "normal" children if they come to grips with the "different" children early on.

As long as a child is educable (one who can participate in class, not violent and not be disruptive to others), there should be no reason why learning activities can not be organised in such a way as to help the child learn. Some children may need more intervention than others, but the important thing is for a child not to be left behind.

If left to themselves, the children who are not assisted would become a greater burden to their families, to society and to the community when they grow up.

Answer 6

Yes, they should! Prior to the 1970's, children with disabilities were not given the chance for an education. After parents in the state of Massachusetts petioned their state representives and senators, the first special education law, known as Chapter 766, was passed. It stated that all children, regardless of disabilty, had the right to a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive enviroment. A few years later, the US government passed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which was modeled after 766.

Thanks to these special education laws, today, hundreds of people with special needs are able to go to college, hold steady jobs, and lead productive lives. Before these laws were passed, people thought that kids with special needs weren't able to be educated.  Today, we know that disabled people actually have far more abilities than was previously thought.

Answer 7

Please go to Wikipedia and look for "education".

The definition truly explained the reason for education (in school) especially those who have difficulty in learning.

Regarding hardheaded, childish or any behavioural problems, I also  agree with Mark Twain's opinion to never let (school) education to interfere with someone's learning. Family and environment have profound effect on someone's education.

Answer 8

Children do not need to 'go to education' if education comes to them.

IE: if you have a private tutor covering all the curriculum required by your government in your home, you don't need to go to a school building.

Answer 9

What?  All children deserve an education.  No explaination needed.

Answer 10

Children should never be deprived of their rights to education!

I have a student who was a little hardheaded, flunks his exams, and cannot be bothered to study. All the private teacher the mother hired for him gave up within a month as he will just drift off into his own world during lessons. Even his mother told me on the first day that her son is a bit slow.

But the truth cannot be further, the boy is in fact slightly more intelligent than children his age. But when I first started with him, he had very little confidence in himself (not surprising considering even his mother consider him as having learning difficulties), and was generally disinterested in learning. However, he has shown much improvement and  I sometimes discuss with him lessons that are 2 years beyond his current grade. I think his problem started because he is more curious than students age, it is ironic, but true that children like him can sometime be disruptive in class. However, this is no reason to shut him out of the class!

My point I am trying to make is that we adults should not be the judge to whether a child should receive education or otherwise. It is exactly these children who need more education!

The same goes to institute that expel students for their mistakes. It is much harder logistically to lead a child then to expel them. And it is disgusting that some school closed their doors to these children who most need help...

So to your question, I believe all children should be given a chance to education (being educated does not only include academic matters).