Do you agree with government mandated health coverage for every child that does not already have it?

Question

Do you agree with government mandated health coverage for every child that does not already have it?

Answer 1

it is only a welfare program and will result in actually LESS care and not more, no I dont like it

Answer 2

There is NOTHING in the Constitution of the United States that allows the federal government to interfere in health care so, NO I do not agree.  Socialist medicine has never worked anywhere else but has become a bloated, money sucking bureaucracy that rations health care so that those who have paid the most in taxes over their lifetimes actually get the least for it.  If you want to see how the government will mismanage health care for "every child" look at Medicare/Medicaid.  Hold the parents responsible for the children they bring into this world.

Answer 3

Yes!

There is no godly reason why that cannot happen. A great deal of work needs to be done in the health care agenda, and proper health care for all children who's parent are unable to afford private coverage should be on top of the list. It is shameful that there are so many children without basic coverage. The number of emergeny room trips recorded for infants and children in order to see a doctor is a national disgrace! Health care for all dependent children is a must do for the incoming democratic administration!

Answer 4

No I do not agree with it. If you are not finacially ready to have a child then you shouldn't have them until you are. Why should I have to pay for somebody elses child to see a doctor. If Congress takes over heath care, where is that money going to come from, yep you guessed it, our pockets. It's not my fault people dont have medical insurance. I have relatives who soak the system for medical and food because they are to lazy to get jobs. They just rely on government programs, so where is the incentive for them to find jobs?