Do you believe in the "face on mars"/ancient mars civilizations/human martian ancestry?

Question

Do you believe in the "face on mars"/ancient mars civilizations/human martian ancestry?

Answer 1

that face is just some rock/hill, old news

Answer 2

I have heard the theories and they are very interesting. Not sure if I have personally read up on enough evidence to say ya or nay. I defiantly believe in life on other planets though. It would be arrogant for us to think we are the most intelligent life forms no less the ONLY race in existence.

Answer 3

No, that stuff lies in the realm of pseudoscience.  The "face on Mars" has been largely revealed by better photography as a curious but likely natural formation.  Most of the other claims regarding alleged Martian civilization derive from similar assertions of alleged regularity or artificiality in Martian formations; but those asserts fail more rigorous and objective tests of regularity.

The "face on Mars" and similar claims are largely the work of Richard C. Hoagland, a former museum curator who fancies himself a space scientist and has a long history of going after NASA for ridiculuous, ill-supported reasons.

Answer 4

it's a rock.

sheesh...

Answer 5

Nope.

The "face on Mars" is an interesting natural formation, nothing more.  

Answer 6

It's all a hoax! Wake up!

Answer 7

You mean a claim that someone (or something ) rearranged mountains on Mars so that random lighting and shadow would make a vaguely humanoid face on Mars, and then those "people" would have crossed space, vacated their original planet (why?) and settle Earth, forgetting all of their original technology after that feat, and not leaving any records of this?

Well... no.

Answer 8

No, its a carryover from our infancy that we 'recognize' two dots, with a third, and a depression beneath it as a face.  

Its done with all sorts of things, like the "Man in the Moon" too.

Answer 9

There was an ancient civilization on Mars a VERY long time ago. When men were Gods. This local universe was a different place than it is today. All traces, save for crumbling stone structures on earth and Mars give way to an ancient space faring race.

Richard Hoagland's genius found the truth. It's all there in the sacred geometry which mirrors Giza Plateau and other world sites.

Richard Hoagland found natural numbers in the sites of Cydonia, Mars.

Numbers which reflect nature as in geometry, simply geometry. The numbers are a conveyance of intelligence.

Sacred geometry is throughout nature, but structures the size they are on Mars and Earth, show that someone was behind them. Nature can not create structures which show such clear distinction and reveal sacred geometry numbers. nature shows it on the microscale. Intelligent beings show it on the macro scale.

Answer 10

I "believe" it was a combination of a low resolution photo and shadows

Answer 11

Where do they find these people? There is no credible evidence of any kind that alien civilizations have ever lived on Mars or any other planet for that matter.

Answer 12

No.

It is just an optical illusion, casued by small mountisn (hills, actually) and shadows.

Answer 13

Naturally, you pick one of the most controversial of questions as everyone will have a different answer.

As for the face, if we are to believe what NASA tells us then it is just a pile of rocks.

If you look on Richard C. Hoaglands web site (see below link) you will find an extensive data base on this very subject.

Personally I believe that we originated on Mars in the first place.

As for the FACE. It could have been a monument at some point in history, as there are many possible structures on Mars that are NOT nature made.

Answer 14

No.

As for Hoaxland.

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/hoa...

Answer 15

NO,because that face that the probe saw was a face.

But another probe went back to it using a high resolution camera.

And the face was just a sand.

But I do believe that there are microrganisms on Mars.

Answer 16

No, no, and no.

1) the "face on mars" though quite intriguing as a photo from above does not actually represent any human face shaped mound. Upon closer inspection by NASA the mound turned out to be a mere optical illusion and was not shaped like a face at all. The shadows just made it seem that way.

2) There is no evidence of any sort of life on Mars let alone the civilization of a long gone sentient species. The development of a sentient species would most likely take the workings of a complex biosphere and though over a billion years the most of the workings of an ancient civilization would have been turned to dust the fossils left behind from a biosphere would be much easier to find. No such fossils have been found.

3) If life developed on Mars and a piece of rock containing microbes was thrown off from the Martian surface by a meteorite impact then it is possible Earth could have been seeded with life from Mars instead of developing it itself. However, Mars and Earth were very similar in their early stages and there is no reason if life could have developed on Mars why it couldn't have developed on Earth. Life on Earth came very early so if Mars seeded Earth it would have needed to developed life much earlier. The chances of developing life so much earlier than Earth are small by themselves but factor in the chances of a meteorite hitting Mars in just the right spot to through off life into space, the microbes on the Martian soil floating through space surviving the harsh conditions of space despite their primitiveness, and taking the unlikely course to Earth makes this theory nearly impossible.

Answer 17

It's a possibility, Mars supposed to be warmer back in the past.  So mabey there used to be life there, if it was a very old civilization you most likely won't see any remnants on the surface do to the fact that it is either broken down or covered up with dust and rocks.  We will never know if there are ancient artifacts buried below the ground on Mars, because we're not researching Mars, NASA is.  NASA gets to see Mars without anycensorshipp, while on the other hand things are usually alwayscensoredd before presented to the public.  Like how some of my questions on yahoo answers werecensoredd recently, because i was being pro American andexercisingg my freedom of speech.