Do you believe that Roe vs. Wade is an example of the Supreme Court legislating from the bench?

Question

Although it is clearly unnatural and illegal to kill an unborn child who is still within the womb, the US supreme court used the

rationality of "women's privacy" to justify the ruling which gave women the "right to abortion". Clearly our constitution guarantees

all people the right to "life", liberty and the pursuit of

happiness. It is quite a stretch to put the woman's right to privacy above an unborn child's life. It is not clear to me why privacy

has anything to do with abortion what-so-ever. Certainly the right to life is applicable here and not privacy. However once our

society has strayed from the universal spirituals that our nation was founded upon, truth, and integrity can also be

reinterpreted. Our judges and lawmakers have strayed from universal spiritual principles that our founding documents spoke

of, and our nation was built upon. Moral equivalencies are now being used to justify the most twisted reasoning. This tactic

can only work in a nation whose people have lost their moral compass. In today's popular culture, we have completely lost the

ability to distinguish, right from wrong, good from evil normal from abnormal and positive from negative. Moral equivalencies

are constantly being used to justify negative behavior. When our courts do not follow our laws, and our legislators are not

guided by morals and spiritual principles, a free people can not exist. We are witnessing the beginning of the decline and fall

of a once great nation.

Answer 1

It is Life, Liberty and Property (If you are going to comment on the Constitution, at least READ IT!).  Considering the fact that this document was created at a time when the landowners who had slaves didn't equate black people with having even THESE rights, I think you are squawking up the wrong tree.

If you read Roe v Wade in it's entirety, it should make sense to the average person.