Do you believe this information is possible?

Question

Where did he find this information? Did someone make it up or was it written down somewhere? Why are we just now hearing about it if it's true?

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a9d_1176435662

Answer 1

it's not true.

Darwin is correct.

keep in mind, Darwin said nothing about how life started in the first place.

people like to say that Darwin was wrong about that.

it's just a lie.

as for the contention that there is no evidence to support Darwin, that's completely not true.

sometime, if you get a chance, watch the PBS special about teaching intelligent design in Dover, Pa.

ya know, if there was a problem with evolution, you'd think that the first place that would come to light is in universities.

but these kooks know they haven't a prayer there.

so they prey on relatively uneducated folks in small towns.

when i first moved here, there was a meeting about teaching creationism.

i went to see what they were talking about.

fortunately, this is generally a well educated area, and it went nowhere.

when someone calls Darwin into question, they're either lying, or trying to sell religion.

when someone talks about micro and macro evolution, same thing.

when someone confuses evolution with how life came into being in the first place, same thing.  it's not the same.\

you're just hearing it now because he just made it up.

Answer 2

I think that th eonly part which is true right now, is that Micro evolution is a proven fact, while Macro evolution, not yet proven (is a theory based on limited proof. )

Macro evolution states we went from one species and evolved into another- that would be like, a cow over millions of years evolving into a different species and no longer being called a cow-but we have never seen that happen.

The bones people have found are not yet proof of macro evolution-but that information on 'why' is out there for you to research on your own.

I did not listen to anything else he said So I don't know..

but best to understand scientific THEORY from an unbiased source..this man isn't the way to go

Answer 3

One thing to remember is NOT to believe everything you see or hear!  Micro evolution is proven however Macro evolution is just a theory with NO evidence! If we came from primates then why are there still primates?? When something evolves into something else, what it was before it evolved no longer exists. This is because the surrounding environment has changed therefore the being must evolve; if it doesn't evolve then it will die. Survival of the fittest! This is all correct, but all that other c**p about planet X and we are genetically engineered being from aliens is crazy! His argument is that we have 2 less chromosomes than primates so we must be genetically engineered??? HA! That is because we are a DIFFERENT SPECIES!! Don't believe it!!

Answer 4

No I don't,Lloyd Pye has found a niche.Scientific sounding wackiness is his claim to fame.He's taken seriously only by the most ardent believers in the Art Bell crowd.

Answer 5

This guy says a number of very dubious things and seems to have no evidence to back it up.  Modern man looks very much like austropithicus, he states small differences like longer arms and brow ridges, but some modern people have these same traits.  Complex advanced life existing on a planet that spends thousands of years at a stretch in near absolute zero temperatures so far away from our solar systems star is unlikely to the point of being ridiculous.  He says macroevolution isn't real, but bigfoot is?  Give me a break.  He claims vast swathes of science are wrong, but with no proof the sumerian bible is right.  Astronomers know "planet x" exists?  Not so.  They don't even call Pluto a planet anymore.  The bottom line is local news programs suck, I am guessing this was a slow news day, and that is the only way this guy got any air time.

Answer 6

Not a bit.  This guy is a crackpot.  I can't believe a local station would air this sort of c**p.

Answer 7

anything is possible,but the world is never going to end!

Answer 8

Not even close to being true.  Don't fall for these fringe nut cases.

Answer 9

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!

I am speechless, please say you do not believe it is possible for a life form to live on a planet that rotates in an elliptical orbit around our solar system every 3,600 years. It is not even possible. Please delete this question before anyone else reads it. If it were even possible it would only be simple life, like bacteria, from heat from the inner core. No intelligent life would never have a chance to begin to form on a planet as such.

Answer 10

Is it possible, yes. There is no information that I know of that would contradict it's possibility.

Is it true?

Not being a member of the YA Priesthood of Psuedoskeptics

I am not privy to the divine communications of their non existence God. I only have science and reason at my disposal so I can not judge a claim without any evidence on which to base a conclusion.

He does point out some holes in the theory of evolution.

However, I did not hear him provide any evidence that his hypothesis was supported by any experimental findings.

So, seeing no support for the claim I would say that the hypothesis remains unsupported (which is all the rules of science allow). I can not say that it is impossible or even incorrect.

Psiexploration