Do you consider it sexist to question Palin's experience while not questioning Obama's?

Question

Some Clinton supporters consider that Obama's campaign was overtly sexist.

Answer 1

I think the her resume is much larger than being a woman and that the opposition is in such a snit over it they look like they just bit skunk in the ***.

Answer 2

No but i find it wise to question why Mccain picked her ?? he picked her because she's  a woman , that's the only reason he picked her , he thinks women are dumb enough to vote for him , she did NOTHING to be on the ticket , don't even compare her to Obama , she's not 00000.1 % the politician Obama is , Obama is well-known world wide and he's ridiculously smart .

Mccain , if anything , is INSULTING Hillary supporter , what he meant by picking Paulin was that Hillary supporters wanted Hillary because she was a woman and not because she was the best option , so in his little pea-brain they're gonna vote for a woman no matter who she is , Hillary supporters are not that shallow , someone should tell him that , no wonder Mccain's been sliding in the polls since he picked Paulin ! .

Answer 3

No, it is not sexist in any size, shape or way.

The issue on Palin's lack of experience is not coming from Obama or Clinton.  McSame and his surrogates tried to make a huge issue of Obama's "lack of experience" when compared to McSame.  Then, McSame selects, to be a heartbeat from the presidency, a governor without the slightest international experience and marginal and extremely brief executive experience.  That is the issue: McSames selection caught the surrogates with their pants down.  You have to be careful when you elevate talking points to actual issue status, e.g. the Republican surrogates and Obama.  Sometimes there is justice and what goes around comes around.