Do you find it funny that Bush supporters defence of his lies (like WMD's) is.....?

Question

Thats old news now?

As if that makes him a good guy now? Or wasting all those young americans lives is ok now.

Dont these people understand it was his lies that lead to the mortgage, internation relations low point and economic issues in the states now? Or do they share the bloodluist of Bush and McCain?

Answer 1

Please note the following "lies" told by Clinton and his followers about IRAQ and WMDs.  Please note they are all BEFORE Bush came to power.  Let's face it...at the time only morons DIDN'T believe Iraq was working on WMD programs.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."

--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."

--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."

--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."

--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."

Letter to President Clinton, signed by:

-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

Answer 2

The state of the U.S. is such that to question the story put out by the state brainwashing machine is unAmerican. Bush is in power because the brainwashing machine is so effective. Fact is Americans believe in Bush and what he is doing. It would be too much to ask for someone who has been brainwashed from birth to believe that America is the last great hope for freedom, to then recognise the awful truth. Even the antiBush brigade are victims of the same manipulation as most seem to believe that things were rosy prior to Bush. The USA has been the major sponsor of international terorrism since WW2 anbd has managed to dress it up to look like something else. The most amazing example is that the US govt managed to convince its own population that the USA stands at imminent threat from Cuba to the extent that it staged assasination attempts and illegal invasion attempts that forced Cuba to seek protection from the USSR. Cubas only real crime was to set a bad example by showing South America that it was possible to replace  US imposed dictators with popular democracy. Regan is lionised in the U.S. when in fact he was the most murderous terrorist the world has known since Hitler.

Answer 3

Maybe you should ask Democratic VP nominee Joe Biden.

Biden on Meet the Press in 2002, discussing Saddam Hussein: “He’s a long term threat and a short term threat to our national security…We have no choice but to eliminate the threat. This is a guy who is an extreme danger to the world.”

Biden on Meet the Press in 2002: “Saddam must be dislodged from his weapons or dislodged from power.”

Biden in October of 2002: “We must be clear with the American people that we are committing to Iraq for the long haul; not just the day after, but the decade after.”

Biden on Meet the Press in 2007, on Hussein’s WMDs: “Well, the point is, it turned out they didn’t, but everyone in the world thought he had them. The weapons inspectors said he had them. He catalogued — they catalogued them. This was not some, some Cheney, you know, pipe dream. This was, in fact, catalogued.”

Biden on Meet the Press, April 29, 2007: “The threat [Saddam Hussein] presented was that, if Saddam was left unfettered, which I said during that period, for the next five years with sanctions lifted and billions of dollars into his coffers, then I believed he had the ability to acquire a tactical nuclear weapon — not by building it, by purchasing it. I also believed he was a threat in that he was — every single solitary U.N. resolution which he agreed to abide by, which was the equivalent of a peace agreement at the United Nations, after he got out of — after we kicked him out of Kuwait, he was violating. Now, the rules of the road either mean something or they don’t. The international community says “We’re going to enforce the sanctions we placed” or not. And what was the international community doing? The international community was weakening. They were pulling away.”

Answer 4

Lol, no we didn't. Saddam never had nukes, it was all BS so lil georgie could finish what his father started 20 years ago.

Also when was the last time we were attacked before 9/11? It was Bush's fault that he didn't take seriously the threat of a terrorist attack and allowed 10,000 country men and women to die.

Answer 5

By "WMDs," do you mean the chlorine bombs Al Qaeda used while I was in Iraq, or specifically the nuclear warhead Saddam spent his time convincing the world he had already developed?

Clinton said that Iraq had untold stores of chemical weapons.  How was Clinton not lying, but Bush was lying?  They both said the same thing.

Answer 6

Bushbots on Y/A just like to be obnoxious.  Any time I ask a tough question like about Cuba and Russia getting back together, they stay away.  (Kept us safe until Russia puts nuclear missiles back in Cuba.)  There really isn't anything they say that is honest and accurate to defend him.  If it weren't for getting deleted, I'd torture them all the time.  Sucks to be supporters of a loser like Bush.

Answer 7

Some Bush supporters would defend him if he ate boiled babies for breakfast.   They would try to rationalize and justify it and call it his outstanding morality and rightousness.    History will tell the truth that this president seems to find optional.  History will hold him accountable and responsible even though he will not accept accountibility for his actions now.   He and Cheney will go down in the history books much like Mugabe or Hitler.  The world will not be quite so forgiving and understanding as his supporters are.

Answer 8

Wow, I'm so sorry I read this question.  I really didn't want to know that the bush bots had started the revisionist history writing already.  Usually, they wait at least 10 or 15 years before they have the nerve.  You bots have NO idea what you're talking about.

Answer 9

Indeed they must do and because of that the rest of the world needs WMD's to protect themselves from the likes of GW Bush, its a very grim alternative but its the reality when such sick minds exist.

They can talk the talk to fellow blood luster's (badly in Bush's case) but can they really walk the walk? They are scared, and George's body language is nervous, infact they're probably the most freaked out delusional paranoid schizophrenics on this planet.

They would push the button, but if they think others have one too they'd poo their pants, this is to everyone else's advantage in the circumstances.

Answer 10

Lies about WMD's like the 552 tons of uranium yellow cake? That yellow cake uranium had to be sneaked out of Iraq and shipped to Canada where it remains. But that would mean very little to you because after all, even Iran is using its uranium for peaceful purposes.

The birth of Saddam Hussein having WMD's was first brought to light by the William Jefferson Clinton administration back in 1997 and NOT George Bush Jr.

Answer 11

What lies?  We've found, he proved he had them, he used them.  What is it going to take for you morons to get it through your heads?    

Answer 12

well, we could ask all of the kurds they found in mass graves in iraq, but, you know, dead men don't talk.  

Answer 13

Let us focus on the future...Bush is almost gone.

Answer 14

"There will be ample time for people to figure out what went right and what went wrong." -- Republican talking point, 2001-2007

"Bush is history. Let's look to the future" -- Republican talking point, 2008