Do you like this take of what happened in the Collins submarine computerization effort ?

Question

<<Undeniably. A company’s performance is reliant upon the skill and competence of each individual within the corporation. The selection process seems a haphazard random assortment based upon the influential and intellectual capacity of each individual.

The CEO’s nonchalant devil may care attitude seems to have percolated rank and file resulting in an insidiously unsystematic management of the entire project. The main reason for this affable but tediously frustrating methodology is caused by the comforting knowledge that one may exit the scheme if it fares badly.

Raising industriousness, productivity and performance seems exasperatingly tiresome with prime associates influencing contrary and contradictory ideals and goals, albeit towards a singular objective.

The random selection may be readily altered should circumstance dictate. Reviving ardour and fortitude in endeavour within each member seems to be prioritised in the face of many concurrent issues distracting focus from the prime target.

Excess internal pressure placed upon the prime operative and orchestrator has detrimental consequences and requires redress prior to progressing upon course.>>

(terrific insight by Wiz, found on the net)

Answer 1

I have been reading this question over and over again, in various forms, from you.

Please excuse my ignorance, but what the h**l is the Collins Submarine and all that goes with it?

What are you talking about?

Answer 2

The faltering status of the underground submarine Computerisation project determines a review of its governing principles. Exposure to critical analysis hinders progress and therefore is avoided by the coperation.

Detached observers and analysts are able to exact the resulting debacle of the detoured course the present path is taking. Maladministration and discord amongst orchestrants is avoided by the cognising of all participle components of the project enabling a reassessment and restructuring to avert calamitous failure.

The Heads of departments are in full hand of all determining and associated facts and information, thus allaying fears to the contrary. It will succeed as failure is not an option on such inspired projections of innovative initiative and coordinated enterprise..