Do you prefer Federer or Nadal? ?

Question

Do you prefer Federer or Nadal? ?

Answer 1

Federer.  

Answer 2

Nadal all the way. He is the best player in the world. Vamos Rafa!!!

Answer 3

Definitely Federer.  Nadal is always showing off his muscles, pumping his fists in his opponents faces, yanking at his butt, abusing time rules, etc., etc.   His game is all about brute force and intimidation....incredibly boring. Federer is a genius and a gentleman.

Answer 4

Nadal

Answer 5

Federer by a mile. I like his style of tennis and his demeanour of the court is impeccable! He really does seem like a nice guy, and he's so talented like he can speak 3 languages effortlessly, has a great personality, and whats more hes not the kinda guy that is so talented that you'd hate him for it, ya know he's down to earth and not an arrogant and cocky Andy Murray type of person. As for Nadal I can't fault him personality wise but I'm not particularly fond of his style of tennis. I think he's a bit one dimensional and I think he's reminiscent of Lleyton Hewitt where he won't be a very prominent player in a few years time

Answer 6

Federer: much better looking game + more talented = much better to watch. More interesting and diverse personality. Speaks his mind and is always honest. Nadal is evasive in interviews, always avoids saying what's on his mind, he has a five answer repertoire and don't give me that BS about English isn't his first language. Tries to psychologically intimidate opponents with muscle shirts, bouncing around and stalling when things aren't going well for him. Whole game is about putting a lot of spin on his shots over and over again until his opponent screws up; incredibly boring, unimaginative and one dimensional whereas Federer creates points like like an artist paints a masterpiece and always tries to finish it off with a winner. For the sake of the game of tennis BRING BACK THE DOMINANCE OF FEDERER!!!

Answer 7

I like Federer's technique on his strokes better, but overall I like Nadal more.

Answer 8

Nadal

Answer 9

NADAL NADAL NADAL NADAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... VAMOS RAFA!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 10

Roger Federer =]

Answer 11

Nadal is getting on my nerves.Federer is more of a classic wimbledon institution.l don't know but l prefer either if they defeat that tosser from north of the border

Answer 12

ROGER FEDERER.

Answer 13

Nadal because he is just getting into the swing of things and he has alot more in him federer is old news nadal gona be the best now

Answer 14

Federer - he has skill and fnesse, whereas Nadal is all brute force, and in the long-term is bad for the game, as, like the Williams sisters and others in the women's game, he will drive those with skill into retirement.

Answer 15

federer because he has many more titles than nadal.

this year he is not playing well but that doesn't mean that nadal is better than him.

Answer 16

Federer.

Answer 17

THIS IS A POPULAR QUESTION - FEDERER!

Answer 18

Hmmm, Probably Nadal But you have to appreciate both of them and as a neutral I really do! I hope to see Federer return to top form and make their rivalry less one-sided again!

Answer 19

i like both of them, but i'm not crazy about any of them either.-

but if i have to choose i think i'm going with rafa, don't know why.-

Answer 20

NADAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...

Answer 21

Honestly I like that nadal is winning now, but when Federer is playing well he is much better to watch.

Answer 22

Federer. I like Roger Federer because he is calm and doesn't pull his bottom like Rafael Nadal.

Answer 23

Nadal, he's a very good player and he's beaten Federer twice in quick succession, Wimbledon the the Olympics. You can't ignore the facts!

Answer 24

I like both of them. Good guys who play hard and who have lots of skills. One of them is already bound for the HoF and the other could be on his heels.

Answer 25

Federer has smart, elegant and strategic play. Nadal runs like a horse, hits the ball like hulk. Two deferent style but i prefer Federer by far

Answer 26

I am huge fan of roger.and I prefer federe than nadal.roger is a geniuse tennis player with gr88 tactics,and I think he is the best tennis player history has ever seen.

To finish with, some numbers that make you dizzy:

Longest winning streak on hard courts: 56 (2005-06).

Longest winning streak on grass courts: 65 (2003-2008 ).

Longest winning streak against top ten players: 26 (2003-2005).

Most consecutive singles finals won: 24 (2003-2005).

Highest number of ranking points at the end of the year: 8,370 (2006).

Highest number of ranking points at any time of the year: 8,370 (November 20, 2006).

Highest number of race points since 2000: 1,674 (November 20, 2006).

Earliest to clinch the year-end No. 1 ranking: September (2004).

Winner of his first seven Grand Slam singles finals.

Played the most consecutive Grand Slam singles finals: 10 (Wimbledon 2005-US Open 2007).

Played the most consecutive Grand Slam singles semifinals: 17 (Wimbledon 2004-present).

First player to win four ATP Masters Series (since 1990) tournaments in one year (2005). Repeated that achievement in 2006.

Best 2-year match winning percentage: 95.0% (2005-06).

Best 3-year match winning percentage: 94.3% (2004-06).

Best 3-year tournament winning percentage: 69.4% (2004-06).

Best 4-year match winning percentage: 93.0% (2004-07).

Has had 5 winning streaks of at least 20 consecutive matches.

First man to win at least 10 titles in a year without losing in a final: 2004.

First player to record a "Double Bagel" at a year-end championship: Federer defeated Gastón Gaudio in a semifinal of the 2005 Tennis Masters Cup.

Only player to have won both Wimbledon and the US Open in the same year for four consecutive years: 2004-07.

Only player to have won at least three Grand Slam singles tournaments in a year three times: 2004, 2006, and 2007.

First player to win the ATP Masters Series tournaments in Indian Wells and Miami back-to-back in consecutive years: 2005-06.

First male player to win at least 10 singles titles in each of three consecutive years: 2004-06.

Best percentage of finals reached in a year: 94.1% in 2006 (16 out of 17).

Most prize money in one year: U.S.$10,130,620 (2007).

I HOPE U ENJOY IT.THAT'S WHAT I LOVE ABOUT HIM.

Answer 27

Federer has played in a dominant fashion for many years now, much in th same way Sampras did in his day.  Nadal is not quite as accomplished, but the more exciting player much like Agassi.  I always prefered Agassi, and so now I would say Nadal.  Like Agassi, he is a worthy challenger.

Answer 28

I prefer Federer than Nadal. Nadal has won against Federer on grass,etc. because Roger has got a mono and it is very hard on the body. You are tired for months and it takes years before it is out. That is why Roger has been beaten by Gilles Simon and James Blake, etc.  Nadal is 5 years younger than Federer and it starts to show on the performance and endurance. I prefer Djokovic with his imitations than Nadal. Yeah, even if Nadal wins like 30 titles in 2 weeks, I would not like Nadal yet. I will like him when he starts to lose control like Federer did at 27 years old.  

Answer 29

I do prefer the tennis King of Mallorca; he is pretty young and can win

many more titles the world over. Time will tell us!