I personally don't think he should have won this award. Ya he is a good defender but he is not defensive player of the year caliber. The NBA gave it to him because it was such a big deal about the Boston Celtics this year that they had to give somebody an award on that team and that was the closest thing that wouldnt be as argumentative as say if Garnet won the MVP award. I know Celtics were the best defensive team last year statistics wise, but that has to do with the team defense, not a specific player. I know stats aren't everything, but they play a big part in winning awards and Garnet's stats were not Defensive player of the year material. Garnet didnt even average 10 rebounds or 1.5 blocks or 1.5 steals. Ronny Turiaf averaged more blocks than he did. And he is not even a lock down defensive player. Kenyon Martin is better at Man defense than Garnet. Marcus Camby or Dwight Howard should have won the award. IT pisses me off how the NBA determined this award and it a bunch of c**p. what u guys think?
Tags: