Do you think Governor Richardson was a "Judas" to Hillary as James Carville has said?

Question

Carville claimed that Richardson owed the Clintons at least staying neutral after all they have done to make his career as a politician.

Answer 1

No. Governor Richardson is a politician, and his primary concern MUST be the people of his state and country. Political loyalty is completely and utterly meaningless. He has the DUTY to support the candidate he thinks is best suited to fix our nation, regardless of his friendships. Whether or not he made the right choice you can debate, but whether or not he should have acted differently because of his associations should not be an issue whatsoever.

Answer 2

All is fair in 'love and politics (war)!

Answer 3

Yes, I think he sold out the people who put him where is for whatever position the Obama camp promised him.

I am glad he did it just proves he has no loyalty. If he can't be loyal to the people who gave him his start how loyal will he be to the people in which he wants to serve, he has already gone against the people of his state.

Answer 4

Mr. Taco is exactly right. He's supporting the candidate he believes is best for the country and, probably as important for him as a politician, in the best position to win.

Answer 5

"Judas" is a bit too strong a word, but it sure was a huge slap in the face to the Clintons.

Answer 6

Carville needs to take a pill.  The union is a beautiful one.

Answer 7

No.  Each person's vote is their own, friendship has nothing to do with it.  Carville was being a brat.  I have friends that voted for Bush, but I would never vote for Bush.

Answer 8

No.

Answer 9

no, she doesn't need any other Judas, she has her lying self.

Answer 10

No Judas there, just play hatin' goin on. They acted like babies on that one. No one has to stay with you just because they were with you before.

Answer 11

no...Hillary only thinks she' s Jesus