Do you think Nasa Scientists Theories are right or wrong and why?

Question

Changes in the Sun’s Surface to Bring Next Climate Change

January 2, 2008

Today, the Space and Science Research Center (SSRC), in Orlando, Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in the sun’s surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of a long lasting cold era.

Today, Director of the SSRC, John Casey has reaffirmed earlier research he led that independently discovered the sun’s changes are the result of a family of cycles that bring about climate shifts from cold climate to warm and back again.

“We today confirm the recent announcement by NASA that there are historic and important changes taking place on the sun’s surface. They will have only one outcome – a new climate change is coming that will bring an extended period of deep cold to the planet. http://www.spaceandscience.net/id16.html

Answer 1

Just because a group of religious nuts can find someone to set up a web page for them, does not make them experts in the field of climitology. As already pointed out, this group lied about its connections with NASA.

Now that you know that the web site is a lie, please withdraw your question. For the moment, we will assume that you were fooled by the lies instead of being one of the perpetrators.

Answer 2

Do you even know who Casey is, or did you post this because it fits your beliefs? Casey is not associated with NASA.

**************************************...

"Further, the solar physics group at NASA has published their own prediction of a coming deep solar minimum, what the SSRC calls a "solar hibernation." The link below shows NASA's prediction of when the next minimum will occur. Though the SSRC and NASA differ on the exact start (Cycle 24 vs.cycle 25, respectively), both have separately concluded that an historic low period of the sun's activity is coming. NASA has not yet announced their correlation between the coming solar minimum and its potential impacts on the Earth's temperatures or climate. However, because this correlation is already well established and because we have the premliminary signs of the sun's unusually slow surface flows reported by NASA, the SSRC and other scientists, have concluded the process of changeover to the next climate era has begun."

**************************************...

Answer 3

Some people will believe anything if it fits their alarmist agenda, but will discount similar evidence if it disagrees with their warming agenda.  Personally, I won't lose any sleep either way.  There is clearly a chance that we might enter into a period of cold and many past cold and warm periods were related to solar activity.  Just because we emitted moderate amounts of CO2 is no reason to believe that we are now free from the natural cycles of warming and cooling.  I just hope that if we do have a cold period that perhaps a bit more CO2 will help moderate it a bit.  Crabby needs to learn the difference between fact and theory.

Answer 4

thanks for the link

NASA scientists don't support this theory. i believe it is referencing NASA data that there are changes in the sun. then it is implying that NASA also supports this theory.

Answer 5

Theories are neither right nor wrong. They are put forward to be tested then proved right or wrong. That's why they are called theory and not law. That is what the scientific method is all about.

Answer 6

Such a shame that so many cannot actually read the question or go to the link before answering.

That being said, I think you will find that we could be knee-deep in glacial ice and you would still have the global warming crowd claiming that it was all caused by warming and CO2 emmisions.

I feel sorry for my grandchildren (when they get here).  They will be inundated by a global cooling crisis that will be at least as financially devistating to them as the global warming crowd is trying to be.

Global cooling hysteria started in 1899, not 1974, and global warming hysteria started in 1933, not 1988.  I would bet that there have been fear mongers crying about the variations in weather even longer than that.  Even sadder is the fact that all these warming graphs are based on computer models, and not actual temperature readings.  That's right!  No actual temperatures were used in ANY of these graphs, and none in the movie "An Inconvenient Truth."

Anyone who does not think that Global Warming is politically motivated must not be old enough to remember the Alar and DDT scares of the past.  When I see politicians reporting the work of scientists instead of the scientists themselves, I always reach for my wallet to make sure it has not yet been "picked."

Answer 7

That is NOT a NASA site or organization.  Its a website set up by some "skeptics" -- in short , its a fraud.

As for the "theory"-- its jsut more of the crackpot nonsense that these kooks put out.

Man-made global warming is a proven fact. Get over it.

Answer 8

NASA is right.  Solar cycle 24 will probably be large, 25 will probably be small.

SSRC is wrong.  This will not "bring an extended period of deep cold to the planet."  NASA never claimed it would, because this is a scientifically ignorant conclusion.

Answer 9

LOL....our local weatherman now knows more about solar output than the SSRC...

I believe the local weather in China would support NASA and the SSRC's findings...

Answer 10

The SSRC page and .doc reference the NASA (2006) web page:  http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/...

Which 'predicts' solar cycles - Cycle 24 is NOT following projections.

You can monitor the Sun's activity here:

http://www.spaceweather.com/

The most important factor on this web site is Interplanetary MAGNETIC Field, which effects the earth's core and Magma flow  as well as 'plate tectonics'.

What 'warmers' don't want you to see and even NASA 'Overlooks:

http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/vwlessons/...

Without the heat from within the earth to warm the oceans = We could be looking at another 'solar minimum' or small ice age.

http://home.earthlink.net/~ponderthemaun...

It's the Sun's inactivity that concerns me - not contrived CO2 weather 'forcing'.

Answer 11

Historically, you tend to see period of above average temperatures, then periods of below average temperatures.  Right now, for instance, China is encountering the coldest weather ever. So yes, the research sounds reasonable to me.