Do you think WM undefeated streak is really important to The Undertaker ?

Question

I know it's part of his legacy, and possibly it will never be ended by anyone till Taker retires, but do you think it's really important for him?

If so, why Taker doesn't mind losing it to someone ? And do you think it should end ?

WQ : Which one is greater, Taker undefeated streak or Flair's title reign ? ( I asked this once before, but hey, this won't be a problem right ?)

Answer 1

Agree with Jeff Above me

The Streak means more and its part of Wrestlemania Tradition the biggest thing in Wrestling.

Flairs title reign is prettyy long but he did lose it that many times to.

Answer 2

Takers streak is important because well he also had the title few times and at the same time hes undefeated at WM so he has both while flair just got the title more

and i think Kane will be the man to do it

Answer 3

i think he wants to kick someones a** more than keep a wm winning streak.i think it should end as his last match kinda like flair.

speakin of flair, i think taker is a little more impressive cause he just won over so many guys in a row.  

Answer 4

Undertaker's undefeated streak is very important to his legacy. His undefeated streak helps out his credibility and reputation. I don't think it should end at all as this is what part of his career is looked on.

WA: Undertaker's undefeated streak. At the same time, putting your undefeated streak on the line is similar to putting your title on the line. Flair's title reign means a lot, but that means he had failed to defend his title and had to regain it. I'm not taking anything away from Flair as he is one of the best in the business.

Answer 5

Yeah very important to him.

WQ:Takers undefeated sreak, because his title reign also means he lost it that many times.

Answer 6

It's been said that the Undertaker doesn't mind losing the streak to someone.

It's the fans that are more obsessed with the streak than anything.