A sergeant/lieutenant has control over the experiences and immediate action of his/her troops. Although a higher ranking officer may draw up an elaborate plan, it is up to the commanders in the field to actually implement and improvise. The same is true in education. When females act as the commanders in the field, it is up to them to actually implement and improvise grand strategies. At least as much (and I'd argue more) real control that actually affects children is held by females in education.
In Brown vs. Board of Education it was found that having black students exposed to white teachers caused the black children to identify being white as being superior. Why is it acceptable logic in this instance but not acceptable logic when it comes to female hegemony in education adversely affecting male students?
Perhaps it does not play into your gender stereotypes. Every being ever born into this world was born by a woman. If that's not an opportunity for equal influence, what is?
Tags: