Do you think keeping posted content in R&S as suitable for younger audiences is a good idea?

Question

i.e. no s**t, no child indoctrination theories

Or should people be allowed to warn children online about adult predatory behaviour, both sexual, social and psychological/emotional?

Answer 1

I wouldn't mind if we had to use a credit card for ID to keep the kids out. I imagine some of the more obnoxious posts come from them. It would also make it easier to catch predators.

'It might allow some see the wisdom of no religion."

Eeeeeyeah.

<edit> Let's see some of that wisdom w/o religion...

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

(Ah! A classic in the  "Why do Christians hate science?" vein.)

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

(Such intellectual fare is seldom seen outside of f**t jokes. This is of course a very tame one compared to most.)

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

(Scroll down to my answer. Hey, maybe there are no Christians here. Maybe every Christian is just a stealth troll atheist!)

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

(And the professor here is so filled with hate for Catholics he refused to admit Bismark & Wilhelm II were Lutherans not Catholic[Wilhelm II was head of the Prussian Lutheran Church no less!], wasn't the head of the Holy Roman Empire since it ended in 1806, that the Nuremberg trials discovered Hitler wanted to end Christianity proving he wasn't a Christian,and Newton wasn't persecuted by the Catholic Church because he lived in Protestant England...even though you can simply Google those things and see they're true. <snicker>. He also doesn't get China is run by atheists, even though most of the population isn't atheist. Then he has the nerve to say my website has false data!  And don't you just love the whole "Christians is retarded and us atheist is smarter" type question we SO VERY seldom see on here?)

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

(This one quotes Marx, but will probably deny the Communists were  atheists when someone mentions the 100 million people they killed in the 20th century. Opiate of the people...lol! And don't you love the condesending tone of the question?)

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

(Ah, case in point. This one tried to prove Stalin was a Christian, but even some of his fellow atheists wouldn't let him slide on that one. In the end, he picked the silly answer since no one would agree, because few people here want answers, they want reassurance.)

"The wisdom of no religion"....I'll stick to being an ignorant Christian, thanks.

Answer 2

There are a couple of people on here I would not want near my kids, if that's what you mean...

EDIT:  And I am telling you that the content posted here is NOT suitable for my children...are we clear?

As for warning children about predators - who do you think would be against that?  Besides predators?

Answer 3

Censorship is for n***s, communists, and cults.

Parenting is for parents.  

Keep the two separate.

Answer 4

This gives people the opportunity to share all beliefs and thoughts, which in school children do anyway.  My kids have told me that nothing they have seen on the computers is anything they haven't had to deal with at school.  Parents should warn children about predatory behavior, my girls would not under any circumstances go see someone they talked to on line.  

When I talked to all the kids about this they said, "dad only an idiot would do that."  

They themselves have accounts that are both adult and their age.

They told me they have accounts that are both male and female to answer questions.  

We are the ones who are just learning, they know all this stuff.

They told me when some woman asks me personal stuff it may be a guy so for me to be careful.  I told them I don't communicate with anyone on here.

Answer 5

yes it is a family area for all not just adults.

Content posted should be in a family atmosphere.

Answer 6

Children are being warned these days now more than ever about predators online. Again, it falls to the parents to monitor their children's acivities while online so we have to hope they're doing their job! But content on R&S needs to stay clean because s**t is just not necessary (cmon really people! Go read a Playboy privately, keep it out of here) and "child indoctrination theories" as you call them are not questions and wouldn't be allowed anyway. I don't see where you're going with that one anyway because I can't see a child becoming indoctrinated by reading questions about religion. Besides, if someone disagrees with the religion I teach my child, who are they to say I can't teach them? Until they're 18 and out of my house, it is up to ME to decide what I will and will not "indoctrinate" *heavy sarcasm* my child with.

Edit:

How very clever of you to take my words and warp them to fit your own twisted reality. Are you proud of yourself? What a smart little boy you are! Yes you are! You're a smart one! Are you a Democrat by chance?

Answer 7

It might allow some see the wisdom of no religion.

Answer 8

Only mature young adults, because of the hate that comes from some of the immature young/old adults is not suitable for anyone.

GOD BLESS YOU!

Answer 9

The younger generation knows more about s*x nowadays than most adults, so Y!A is making an unneeded attempt