Question:

Do you think ................?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

do you think that Rafa is under- rated.?????

some how..I do.

 Tags:

   Report
Answer The Question I've Same Question Too

15 ANSWERS

Sort By: Date  |  Rating

  1. no.-


  2. no he's not, he must win at least 10 Grand Slam for him to be considered great... he's only have 4 ryt now

  3. he is not underrated

  4. No. He has potential and mental strength to beat anyone. He just sometimes misses some opportunities do it (on grass).

  5. Hang on now! Greatest of all time is overdoing it somewhat. What about all the greats before him, Becker, McEnroe, Sampras,Rafter,Laver,Connors,Borg,etc etc etc ! He may be very good, but if he had som of those players to face it may be a different story. As it is, he doesn't have complete sway over Federer as yet. Don't count your chickens before they're hatched, as the saying goes. Man! You really have a thing for this guy, don't you?

  6. I don't think he is underrated. He needs to win more big hard and grass titles to be considered one of the greatest of all time. he has won plenty of time on clay, but he needs to prove himself even more on the two other surfaces.

  7. No it is right. Rafa is a player.

  8. I do not think so.

  9. Roger is the reason.

    Roger came out a few years early and he dazzles the tennis world with his talent. everybody believe he's the tennis genius of our generation. Rafa is under his shadow and he's progress is impressive but not like Roger amazes everybody after his break through. Remember Roger handed out 19 bagel sets in 2006? that was pure domination.

    while Rafa improve gradually to this stage and still under Roger's shadow, because, there couldn't be two "best ever", could it?

  10. nadal is amazing. he has arguably the best mental and physical stength on the mens tour. he is a show man and draws massive crowds. they r never disappointed as he always gives 1000% effort

  11. He still has a long way to go 4 grand slams are not enough to be called the greatest.

  12. I do not think he is underrated but because Federer has been so dominant and still is people are a bit hesitant to pass the title on to Rafa right now.  If he wins Wimbledon and US open then he would be well on his way but remember he has only been winning on clay.  If he can carry over his winnings to other surfaces he will indeed be given the credit he so richly deserve.

  13. I am not rafa fan but I think he is great specially on clay.but in my opinion b'coz some how he doesn't play with his thoughts others don't consider him a gr88 tennis player. but I don't think under_rated is a nice word.he can improve & he will be better than now.

    but all of this considerations are b'coz of ROGER FEDERER.

    roger is the best.

  14. Hard to call the man "under-rated" when he has won over $17 million on the courts at age 22 and with 4 French Open titles in a row.  If not for Roger, he would have been #1 for the past 3 years, and probably won at least 2 Wimbledon titles to go with the French.

    At this point, it is very likely he could be one of the ten best ever - along with Laver (my all time #1), Federer, Sampras, Agassi, Borg, Emerson, Connors, McEnroe, and Lendl - of course, this list is always subject to change!

  15. HUH??
You're reading: Do you think ................?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 15 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Register Now