Do you think s*x should be added to the basic human right list?

Question

If YES why? if NO why?

Answer 1

haha no you don't "need" it to survive.

Answer 2

It's not a right; at best, it's a function of procreation, and at worst, a depravity, and neither of those qualifies it as a right. Besides, you can't "make" a right. Either something is, or it isn't.

Answer 3

dirty b*****d

Answer 4

It's already covered. Each of the "rights" in the list of basic human rights is so broadly defined as to include s*x. That was the intention in defining the list, as implied by the word "basic".

Answer 5

No.

There are people out there that have different ideas to what s*x is and who they choose as a partners for s*x.

I don't have a problem with grown adults having consensual s*x with each other be it hetero or homosexual.

It's the people who would claim in a court of law that they prefer animals or even worse children.

Making it a right and then disclosing that you have weird ideas could open up a defense for them when they commit crimes.

Claiming that they all ways had these feeling and should not be prosicuted for diclosing them

Answer 6

No, I don't think so.

      World overpopulation and youth protection are two compelling reasons why s*x shouldn't be added to the basic human rights list.

    s*x is a privilege that has responsibilities attached, and to make s*x a basic right would eliminate the responsibility part, causing epidemic levels of single parenthood and kids having kids.

Answer 7

Yes, s*x is a physiological needs that need to be given attention by couples, specifically those married already. It is better to be placed on the list so that individuals would not abusive of it and thus respect it as divine and not for recreation alone.

Answer 8

yes.  people are entitled to freedom.  i think id be awsome if it stopped prositution also.

Answer 9

no because it wasnt designed to be that way

Answer 10

No. It should not be necessary to add a biological function to a list of "rights." Plus, why would you pigeon-hole it as a "human right" when "... birds do it, bees do it, even educated fleas do it ...."

    Plus, if you are referring to this list -  http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html - it doesn't appear it's really worth the trouble to ADD to a list that is not now respected.  

Answer 11

The church would have a COW.

Answer 12

Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Because s*x its the only way a boy a girls share love passion and plesseure  

Answer 13

Absolutely not.

Answer 14

No, because it is not forbidden.

Answer 15

Yes but having kids should be regulated.

I don't think we can take care of all the children we are having. It's not fair to THEM! or the Planet

Answer 16

no, and you don't need it to live. there are plenty of other ways to have fun.

Answer 17

No - as a matter of fact, as$holes should be DEPRIVED of that "right."