Do you think the West wants to restore the Tatar Khanate in Siberia?

Question

..and break up the Russian Federation?

Without Siberia, Russia would lose most of her natural resources and also most of her land mass ( about 75%).

So, if I was NATO I would want to make the indigenous people of Siberia revolt against the Russians living there and rule from Moscow.

Do you think the West will try to do this?

Answer 1

Siberia have nothing with tartarians,they want restore in our holy russian Crimea...in Stalin times USA planned make there jewish country and bought for rent it,but after Stalin Khrushev showed his boots...

Answer 2

WWWWWWWWWWWaaawwwwwwww  - he made my day - roftlmao-

How many tatars on how many acres of Siberia ? Please say it once again - sometimes laughing makes you cry !!!!!!!

Answer 3

there’s another scheme actually to control Siberian taps;  

Answer 4

No, I don't think so.

From your question I understand that you have never met any of the indigenous people of Siberia and you don't really know much about them.

Just compare the anti Americanism in the western countries with the anti Russian feeling (which exists only in eastern Europe) and see who is more hated in the world.

If you call yourself a pastor, keep in mind how much the Russians did for Christianity and the western civilization... and please don't forget who is the real enemy of the western world today.

Answer 5

I am going to explain you a thing bustles about to them of Russia concern only it and then me to you guaranteed that there will not be uprising for the simple reason that the persons who lives in Siberia in his feeding and to lodge in the fertilization of the state and for the simple reason that they all have Russian nationality and for the simple reason that he is not so numerous because it is really cold there has more military base, and of scientist who lives there. and then TATAR not to them words it have say, if already they are let live normally, is necessary to be happy

Answer 6

the Siberia was originally populated by turkic mongolic and tungusic, but now, russia is the majority, especially in south siberia bordering China and the far east. so, it's pretty much "russianized".  

Answer 7

The Tartars actually do not live in Siberia. Besides, it often seems that they're the actual driving force behind modern-day Russian oligarchy. While the ordinary Tartars themselves might want to have an independent nation-state, it is unlikely that their leaders would allow anything like that, since they benefit from being part of the Russian Federation more than the Russians benefit from having them in it. It also has to be noted that Tatarstan is quite small, even though it has a formidable share of resources.

The indigenous peoples of Siberia are too few in numbers and too backward to organise any kind of resistance. It is much more reasonable to fear that the region shall be repopulated by Chinese immigrants and shall be gradually transferred to China. In fact, several regions in Southern Siberia have already been declared Chinese. Russia has been consistently giving up regions to China since 1991. As an ethnic Russian and a Russian citizen, I find that humiliating.

The resources. Russia should use its current colonies to try to build up a formidable light industry and stop having a resource-based economy. That is fitting for a third world country, but not for a modern European nation that used to be the leading force in the old world for quite some time. It is a disgrace that without massive export of raw resources which it could effectively process itself, specifically without high gas and oil prices, the Russian economy would collapse.