Do you think the scientific establishment is a mouthpiece for Atheism? ?

Question

And do you think its time we stopped pandering to institutions like the National Academy for Science Education, who push a materialistic and Darwinist agenda, and protested against the dissemination of atheist propaganda under the cloak of presenting scientific "fact"?

Isn't it time we enforced "regime change" in our universities and told the Atheist scientists that they have 24 hours to clear their desks?

Isn't it time we reclaimed the American Dream and ended the Atheist Nightmare?

Answer 1

You like Theocracies, I see.

The US is not one, yet.

Though you may get your wish if the McCain/Palin ticket gets elected.

Answer 2

I think that Science could be used for the glory of the Kingdom.

Science only allows us to understand God's creation, and therefore could be very spiritually enlightening.

Unfortunately, people manipulate it a lot to their own advantage..

It's up to us not to let us be influenced by such attitude.

Answer 3

I think atheists hide behind science pretending to understand it but in reality only repeating what they read online.  Atheists accuse religious people of not thinking logically but they don't even understand their own beliefs from a scientific perspective.

Answer 4

Heaven forbid that you actually listen to scientists when determining scientific theories, far better to rely on an iron age belief system to work out things like biology, after all who needs the enlightenment anyway, far better for us to be killing off cats because they're demonic familiars rather than the rats with the plague-carrying fleas.

"Regime change" is just the latest polite euphemism for destabilising and overthrowing any country that the US feels like. It's become a bit of a joke, "behave or the USA will bring democracy to your country".

Answer 5

Excuse me, but ever since this country has become more secular and atheistic, everything has become much better than ever!  *pops anti-depressant* Everyone knows that! xD

Answer 6

As a science teacher I'm probably part of the scientific establishment.  And I am not a mouthpiece for atheism.

If I were a biologist, which I am not, I would do my job and teach Darwinism, one of the most successful scientific theories EVER.  Non scientific dogmatism has no place in science education.

Answer 7

It's not the atheist's fault that scientific facts disprove your religion.

Answer 8

Yes.

We Brits, along with the rest of the world, are sitting here laughing as your IQ drops again and again each year.

Eventually you'll just blow up or tree shrews will overthrow your government.

Answer 9

Hey Sarah Patin as a hard liner Pentecostal is all for that... when she was elected Mayor of a small town in Alaska she fired all the public officials that didn't support her during her election... can you imagine what she will do if McCain can't finish his term and she becomes the president of the USA?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-schme...

  

Answer 10

So the American Dream is to have absolutely no science education?

Answer 11

> Do you think the scientific establishment is a mouthpiece for Atheism?

No.  I think it's a mouthpiece for science.  Science makes observations and attempts to come up with the best explanation for those observations.

So far, the best explanation hasn't been "The god of Abraham."  Stay tuned.

Answer 12

"Isn't it time we reclaimed the American Dream and ended the Atheist Nightmare?"

You do realize that the American Dream has nothing to do with religion, right?

[edit:] You really should watch this video, it's talking about people like you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUQfvRaF6...

Answer 13

You want to bring an end to the atheist nightmare?

What have you got against bananas?

Answer 14

Science doesn't deal in proof. Science observes and experiments and proposes hypotheses to explain the observations. If the hypothesis explains all the observations and is able to predict what should be observed then it gains the status of a theory but a theory is as good as it gets in science.

Answer 15

I look forward to reading the news story about your protest against facts.  

Answer 16

Your country is in serious trouble, friend. And I don't mean from the scientific establishment.

Answer 17

Yeah. You go ahead and do that, Wimpthorp. We'll just see how much success you have with your radical agenda. The scientific establishment has but one agenda, and that is to learn about the universe and its workings. If their findings conflict with your narrow and primitive religious superstitions, then too bad for you. Perhaps you should take it as a sign that you need to adopt a more mature view of your religion.

Answer 18

You've had enough control already.

Don't take education away from future generations of children.

Answer 19

First off, you are in violation of the Patriot Act. Second thing, you sound like a whacked out religious fundamentalist. Which means your agenda and thought process are unimaginably warped. Would your buddy Jesus rant this way? LOL

Answer 20

Not for atheism as we usually define it.  Science by definition is atheistic.  However that does not mean that science denies the existence of God.  What it means is that God, and all that is supernatural, lies totally outside the purview of science.  Science by definition is the study of the natural world in natural terms.  Therefore Science is not qualified to make any statements one way or the other about anything supernatural.  Therefore science cannot be a mouthpiece for the belief that God doesn't exist - or that He does.

Answer 21

I've heard more creative conspiracy theories.

Answer 22

No, I don't think so; but then I am not a paranoid evangelical, or a dominionist.  

America is a democracy - not a theocracy. Deal with it.

Answer 23

In answer to your primary question, No.  Many scientists are religious and many religious people support science and science education.

To address the rest of your questions, these are not really questions but merely a way to couch your own opinions in the guise of a question in hopes that people will think they are assumed facts, which they are not.

If you want to live in a world where religious thought reigns supreme over science, try traveling back in time to the Dark ages.  You might enjoy living in the year 1000, for example.

Answer 24

this is a joke, right?  nobody is really this obtuse.  impossible i say.  

Answer 25

Sadly if we follow your vision, you would halt technical advances, Why not turn back the clock of technology back to colonial times? The genie has already been let out of the bottle, You might as well halt education at the sixth grade level.

As you have stated you follow the 'Colonial Dream' of pre-constitutional puritanism as embodied by John Winthrop.