Do you think the should play these sports in the Olympics?

Question

Cross Country Running ,And Lacrosse

Answer 1

no way heck no

Answer 2

i think so. i mean if they have sports like race walking (are u serious?) and table tennis, then why not cross country and lacrosse. cross country would be cool to because it will always change.

Answer 3

Not cross country running, because each course will vary, but definitely lacrosse.

Answer 4

Cross country running yes!

Lacross NO. Lacross is barely a game. It is the WWE of team sports

Answer 5

Yes for lacrosse but no for cross country running

Answer 6

Mostly they should play in the Olympics.

Answer 7

Yes i dont see why not, more so to cross country though.

Answer 8

Yes and Yes.

Cross country would be different each Olympics so no time record would be meaningful.  It would be a great way the host country to show off some of the scenery and terrain of the area.  No to take anything away from track but running in flat circles on a man made surface is not the same as running hills with turns in both directions through sand and dirt and grass.  Much more interesting and requires more thought in strategy. Cross Country is also ran around the world.

Lacrosse has a lot of fans that would be happy.

Answer 9

Well, there's already enough running, including the marathon, which goes across the country, and the triathlon, in which athletes run on a cross country-like course instead of a track.

Lacrosse I could see being there, but I don't know how popular it is world-wide.

I would like to see Ultimate (Frisbee) become an Olympic sport.