I like Obama getting a nomination a little more than Hilliary. Not that I'm an Obama nut. (No I didn't sign up for the Text Message 3 AM thing.) Just that I remember what kind of h**l the right put Fmr.President Clinton through at the end of his 2nd term. I remember hearing about big scandals, attempted murders (through my uncles rants), political exploitation, and various other shady connections.
Now granted the skill of both Hilliary and Bill outshines and surpasses Barack by a mile. h**l, even Hilliary outshines Barack and he's the nominee. The democrats do belong to them, or at least owe them a great deal. (The Clintons that is.)
However the thing is with Barack it shows now more than ever that republicans claim "they're happy that we gave them the election" but the thing is that my Grandfather (More right-winged than Jerry Falwell, and Limbaugh combined) can only muster up the minor infractions that the media currently offers. Which to me proves my point, or rather the point that previous poster today reiterated to me. Had (democrats) nominated Hilliary we would've seen those big guns and big infractions against the Clintons reassemble. That would've surely given the GOP much more to work with than a senator whose worst connections include Wright, Rezko, and half-brother in Kenya (who supports him lol).
To me it seems that this year it isn't the democrats who are running scared and are unsure of their candidate but rather the GOP. Scars from the interior of the GOP seem more frequent than our apparent Clinton /Obama faction scars do. The only difference like always is that the GOP conservatives (actual fiscal conservatives) are behind closed doors where democrats (like always) are out in the open.
Tags: