Do you want an inexperienced man like Obama as president? ?

Question

When he was a state senator and now as a US Senator, he missed many votes. He has not even attended one meeting of the sub committee he chairs. He has never run a town, a city, a state, nor a company. He has no executive experiece at all.

Answer 1

He has all of the executive experience as McCain, and although he does not have near the overall experience as McCain does, he has ideas I can believe in, has plans to address the issues that I feel are most important, and I believe in the same role of the federal government that he does. It doesn't take experience to understand the issues, and although experience may help in deciding how to go about addressing issues, if all of your experience has taught you that some issues aren't worth addressing (such as health care) and an inexperienced person says it is worth addressing, I have to elect the man with less experience who will at least see where the problem lies than the man who might be better equipped to deal with the problem but not see it as a problem to begin with.

Further, in all of my years reading about presidential overviews and analysis, I fail to recall a single historian blaming a president's lack of experience for any previous president's shortcomings.  Nor can I say that I recall a president who didn't do more in his first 100 days than in almost any other period of his presidency except in regard and response to crises that developed midterm.  Their have been President's with less experience than Obama, and yet it has never been that lack of experience that they were criticized for in retrospect.

Answer 2

Don't forget about his experience as a "community organizer".

Answer 3

You are repeating what the Reps are blowing. He is a senator, so I think he has enough experience. And think: Old men aren't worried about the future because they have none. Obama is the better chose.

Answer 4

@He has never run a town, a city, a state, nor a company.

Your name is.............Rudy Giulliani. You at least now have a little more to say than just 9/11.

Answer 5

YES YES YES!!

No he has not run a town of 9000 people and been state gov or a state of 600,000 people.  

He does not have the foreign policy advantage of living in a state that is close to Russia but he has brilliantly run a campaign of 2500 staffers with a monthly budget of 30 million dollars for almost 2 years.  He is a Harvard Grad in foreign affairs and I know that may not compare to a journalism degree but he is my choice.

I do not want 4 more of the last 8!!!!!

Answer 6

I'm voting for him.

Answer 7

No, remember the speech Bill Clinton gave, how he was unexperienced?

well under his watch he let the Taliban gain power, did nothing on our embassy, the US Cole attack, molesting interns and leave that to the next guy. so back to his speech, Clinton was not exprienced and he stated that Obama reminds him of when he was running.

well Clinton made my choice clear, McCain is experience and wise enough to pick the right VP as well, he showed what real chance is.

Answer 8

Are you serious? Did you really just say he is inexperienced? Go do some research one last time, and ask yourself that same question. Obama is the man. He graduated from Columbia University back in 1983, and than became a comunitee organizer, and let a church. Than he went on to get his degree in law from HARVARD!!! Than he returned to chicago to study civil rights. This guy is not inexperienced.

Answer 9

I think he may make a good leader, but I don't share the same views as him; mostly on moral issues.  

Answer 10

The main question is can he be worse than George Bush?

Answer 11

you voted for george w bush twice ,  he ran a baseball team in the ground , he wasn't and still not qualified to run this country , obama can't do any worse  than george w BUSHit