Does ID/Creation have any evidence that is not subjective?

Question

Does ID/Creation have any evidence that is not subjective?

Answer 1

All arguments I've seen for creationism are flawed.

Answer 2

I've got to see this.

Answer 3

The short answer is NO.  Oh, sorry that's the long answer.

Answer 4

In short, no.

Answer 5

No.

The "Intelligent Design" hypothesis is an argument from limited imagination.  Basically it is someone saying "I don't understand how this could have happened all by itself; therefore, someone else smarter than me must have done it."

How that "someone else smarter than me" came about in the first place is not specified.  Though, the assumption that an intelligent designer was required to account for life on Earth which is less complex than the Designer seems either to require an  infinite regress of Designers, or to admit the possibility of life arising **without** a more-complex-than-itself Designer.

Answer 6

Consider this

Mysteries In Science

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zTXxpXOo...

The Young Age of the Earth

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

The Origin of Man by Dr. Duane Gish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3FZDysZK...

The Origins of Life

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

Evolution: Challenge of the Fossil Record - Part 1 of 6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NkO6fQvy...

Skull Fossils - As Empty as the Evolutionary Theory

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Yu5jN897...

Neanderthals - Smarter Then We Thought

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxL636n3w...

Dinosaurs: Those Terrible Lizards

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVvGByvp1...

Atheist's NightMare: Evolution

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udqoCGPnV...

Our Solar System: Evidence For Creation

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

Answer 7

They would like to think they have. Trouble is that even other Christian biologists, such as Sam Berry or Ghilean Prance, don't take them seriously - and you can't accuse them of having an atheist agenda.

Answer 8

It does have objective evidence (but it is objective evidence against ID/Creation).

Answer 9

Does the evolution story have any evidence:

That life spontaneously generated itself from non-living matter aided by undirected energy from the Sun/lightning?

That the DNA code just invented itself?

That the information carried by the DNA code simply wrote itself?

That the life force which distinguishes living matter from non-living matter just happened to come out of the ether and alight on the self- assembled correct mixture of chemicals in the primordial soup?

There is not just no evidence for any of this, it is inconceivable that any sensible person could believe it.

And, what is more, it is certainly not scientific.

It is much easier to believe:

That the laws of nature applied, and that information came from an intelligent source.

That the life force came from a pre-existing living source.

That a designer designed the living cell.

That intelligence invented the DNA code.

That a First Cause not subject to the laws of nature (supernatural) is the only possible way you can circumvent the breaking of the laws of nature which are necessary for the creation of the material Universe and life.

http://www.questiondarwin.com/

Answer 10

It doesn't have any evidence PERIOD.

Answer 11

That's a loaded question if I ever heard one.

Everyone has the same evidence. What is subjective is how they interpret any given evidence. The facts themselves are objective.

If you want something objective try looking at the complexity and efficiency of any given organism. Try studying information. If you cannot infer design and purpose you are the one that is suffering from "cognitive dissonance."