Several times last night, Obama very pointed said, emphasising the point, "I AM my brother's keeper." How can this be interpreted in any other way than, "The government is the parent of the people." or "The President is father to a million little dependents." and where is this role of government in the Constitution?
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents...." --James Madison
For decades the government has increasingly mandated charity from the people. In fact, democrats have said that if they didn't mandate charity, people are too selfish and would not give. (Chris Redfern, the Democratic Party Chairman of Ohio)
It used to be that communities and private citizens supported what are today social programs. If Obama wants to be America's daddy, why doesn't he use his own money and time? What right does he have to finance his parenthood with OUR money?
Tags: