0 LIKES LikeUnLike
After she made the claim the first time of saying thanks but no thanks to the the bridge to nowhere she was promptly exposed as a liar. Why then would she make the same bold faced lie during the convention? Not only did she not say no to it, she supported it fully. Due to public outcry the hefty earmark for the bridge was taken back but then still given in the form of an equivalent amount of transportation money to be used at its own discretion. And no, it was never given to the people. I'm sure they'd like to have seen some of that wasted 223 million dollars though. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080901/pl_nm/usa_politics_palin1_dc_1
Tags:
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Latest activity: earlier. This question has 6 answers.