Does a serious poet really need an editor?

Question

In your opinion, is it possible for poets and other writers to edit their own work?

Answer 1

yes they could edit thier own work but sometimes its good to get a second opinion  

Answer 2

When I edit my own work, I usually do not see the mistakes I overlooked the first time.  If I make a mistake and don't notice it, I generally don't notice it later either, although there are times when it slaps me up side my head so hard, I can't miss it again.  Edit me extensively, please.

Answer 3

In my opinion, we all can benefit from a GOOD editor.  What I mean by that is, a second set of eyes to check for errors in spelling or word usage.  Example--in a poem I wrote, I used the word "nauseous" when I should have used "nauseated."

When I am asked to "edit" a poem or short story, I first check to be sure I completely understand the poet's or author's intent.   An editor should not inflict their "style" on the writer, simply aide in grammar and spelling.  

Answer 4

You can write for the public and have no self... or you can write for yourself and have no public.

I don't know who said it...but I think it answers your question.

Do not let another taint your work. It has to be beauty in your eyes not others'.

This applies to poems...unless your aim is to send a message publicly, then yes...the public's opinion is required.

Story writing is something else, because stories are meant to be shared. Then the public's opinion is ALWAYS valid.

hope I helped. just my thoughts.

Sameh

Answer 5

I can't do it, as some of my postings show.

Answer 6

Elaine, you know I am new to all this, but I will tell you this....when I go to rework a poem, I find it is grievously difficult because I am so emotionally attached to the words.  I would imagine that a "detached" editor would be more able to make objective corrections.  However, I would hope that if the writer felt the changes destroyed the intent or spirit of their piece...they would have the option to reject such corrections.

ma

Answer 7

That depends on several things.  How competent...editorially speaking ... are the two?  How willing is the writer to carefully inspect his or her own work? Are the aims of the editor, and the sense of proper style, in tune with those of the writer?  Let me go on record as saying that what all writers of talent need even more than an editor is an intelligent reader, one who examines writing not only for its informational content, but also for its voice, its ability to forge links of communication that place the writer and reader, both literally and figuratively, on the same page.  And last, editors and publishers must appreciate the writer as someone who values what they do, though perhaps not in the same way.  

Answer 8

Only to an extent. There's always the risk of being self bias when editing for content. As far as editing for grammar, if they're careful, sure.

One can be their own editor as long as they're the publisher, I guess.

Edit: What I was trying to say was that I don't think self publishing is a good idea, therefore neither is self editing.

Answer 9

I know I can't...Well, I CAN but I have a very hard time dissecting my own stuff, that's why we need people like you!

Answer 10

A serious poet needs a "serious" good editor.  An editor may challenge content but first correct the grammatical.  Then challenge the poet if content is not up to the poet's normal standards.  "Did you think about this" or "how about this for a different approach.." are phrases and actions that will get my attention, not being told that my offering is drival, etc. I will give you the label of SG Editor.

Answer 11

I believe that it is, but can be difficult.  Steel whets steel, at least another set of eyes is good. And those who lack the vision, still may fit the glasses.