a young girl, involving a teen mother in their politics, etc. I've seen many, many answers repeatedly explaining that Dems don't want to involve the daughter, but that since the Mom is a VP candidate *because* of her stance on reproductive rights, Sarah Palin's positions and their effectiveness are very much a legitimate topic. Reproductive rights, Abstinence Only, s*x ed in schools - these are social conservative issues, and being a social conservative is what got her on the ticket - so how can that not be a topic of debate? Young Ms Palin's situation unavoidably puts a spotlight on those issues, and the effectiveness of Gov Palin's preferred policies.
Why do Republicans here never acknowledge the distinction, but keep repeating the complaint that has been answered?
And will those answering just repeat the pattern, or try to change the subject?
(Oh, yes, there have been some direct attacks on Bristol, but I don't count the obviously moronic fringe questions. Or the trolls.)
Tags: