Does anyone actually believe the NIST report on the reason WTC7 collapsed on 9/11?

Question

Have you read this or looked at the videos? Why are there more like, 1600 serious architecs and engineers that say the report is a fraud, more govt lies?

Answer 1

Great, where were they on 9-11 when we needed them? Structural steel fails almost entirely what it was designed for when it is weakened,by 70% or more, in a fire of significant duration- the twins were not designed to withstand an impact from modern aircraft. I learned the value of steel strength when I was an apprentice carpenter. A more apt question would be why let 400 firemen into buildings obviously not designed to handle such an impact and heat range.

Answer 2

i never believe anything the government says

Answer 3

Check your 1600 architects / engineers..... none of them inspected the site..... most of them are little more than glorified out house designers and builders..... none of them ever fought a fire or are familiar with  fire damage....several of them just teach..... they have never built or destroyed anything in their life.... they might as well be grocery store clerks when it comes to making a judgement on WTC7

The facts and pictures fully support "progressive structural failure"

Beyond the facts..... logic does not support any other scenario.... what motive?.... How would they keep it a secret? ....Where did they get the explosive and why did it not burn up in the two hour fire before the collapse?

I am an Engineer..... I am an ex-fire fighter.... I have blown up buildings..... built building..... I know what it takes.... the NIST report is the only logical explanation that meet the facts

Answer 4

I believe them. If you watch videos, the towers fall 'straight' down. Don't you think that towers like that that sway in the wind would fall onto other buildings... It was detonation of bombs on certain floors to make them come down. Architecs and engineers know what they are talking about cause they are experts at what they do, we can't tell them that they are wrong.  

Answer 5

It is a blatant fraud, I read it up to the point that they said that it was all worked out by computers, something us mere mortals couldn't understand.

I don't know what is more shocking, the blatant misinformation, or the fact that so many people take their word for it.

I suppose for the masses that independent thought is trumped by quasi scientific balderdash.

Here's a decent link.

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2008/08/...